Summations Only

Coyote writes: There are a lot more examples out there, but learn a little about these first.

Thanks Coyote. I read them all. None answered my other question.

quote:

---

Were there a lot of them and were they found consistently in strata dating progressively down from 100,000 or were there a few isolated specimens?

---

Buz, nothing will satisfy you, will it?

I'm not going to do all your homework for you when you simply dismiss everything I provide to you.

Yes, there were a lot of them. Look the details up yourself.

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Hey Buzz,

None answered my other question.

Frankly, you would be incredibly lucky and skilled, as an Anthropologist, to find 'a lot' of human remains in the same strata. To find 'a lot' of human remains in the same strata all the way down to 200,000 years ago would be nothing short of miraculous. The fact is that fossilization is an iffy business, and even if a bone does become fossilized it can be unburied due to erosion and basically erode away. That and the fact that we have no way to view what fossils remain in the geology underneath our feet over a large area, helps to keep many fossils hidden. That isn't to say that we don't have evidence of human activities that don't include bones. These can and do include such activities as lithics, butchered bones (ex. marrow extraction, cut marks, pot rub, discoloration, etc.), cultural remains (ex. artwork, homes, fire pits, jewelry, artifacts, etc). If you allow for the full range of fossils and human cultural remains then the breadth of evidence showing Homo Sapiens has been around for more than 100k years is overwhelming.

Buzsaw writes: Coyote writes: There are a lot more examples out there, but learn a little about these first. Thanks Coyote. I read them all. None answered my other question. quote: Were there a lot of them and were they found consistently in strata dating progressively down from 100,000 or were there a few isolated specimens?

What is "a lot of them" and what does "were they found consistently in strata dating progressively down from 100,000 or were there a few isolated specimens" even mean?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Panda writes: Have you noticed that the names are listed alphabetically, except: CD7 writes: Lists of British people Lists of Italians Lists of Swedes I think these were sub-headings which are now included as part of the 55.

-

A word was missing. It was a List of 55 Dispersions of ethnic groups

-

-

Coragyps writes: Added by edit: Wikipedia says "..has a strong smell and bitter taste.."

-

The above info demonstrates to be a result of double ignorance.

Because just as the new oranges are just momentarily green and temporarily not sweet
even so the fruit from the tree of life, Morinda Citrifolia, becomes white when it is ready to be eaten.
And when it is white then it is not bitter anymore.

-

With regard to the smell, the quoted info demonstrates to be a blind leading the blind,

When the fruit of Morinda Citrifolia is White then it is in the same level of a refined soya oil; it does not have a smell

After the fruit is white,
a person has approximately three days to eat it before the fruit begins to decompose.

-

After the three days then the white fruit of Morinda Citrifolia suddenly begins to decompose;

Therefore the vomit smell is just a consequence of the sudden decomposition.

-

quote:

---

This might help with the answer to the question,
'If Humans were not reproducing 30000 years ago how is that humans are here today?'

The following is a sample of what can be verified with science; ascertained truth of the facts,
in regards to the original manuscripts of Genesis,

- Authenticity and validity of the first instruction of Genesis
- Evidences of the existence of the tree of life

---

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Any references that might back you on this?
Not saying it ain't true but why should I blindly believe you.

As an aside.
Sorry Catholic Scientist if asking for a reference insults your sensibilities.

---

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

Being the only tree that gives her fruits 12 months a year it is evident that when the green fruit becomes white it does not give one much time for it to be eaten;

The complete white fruits from the tree of life in real time, Morinda Citrifolia, do only last as fruits for no longer than three days; In a decomposed state it can't be called an actual fruit anymore.

When those three days are complete then the white fruit does desintegrate in less than 35 minutes;
the white flesh within the thin skin becomes a liquid with a vomit smell.

-

Theodoric writes: Any references that might back you on this?

-

Real references are given to anyone who will make some calls and speak to people who live in the cultivation areas;
as it is said, there never was an answer without you experiencing it.

One won't have the real references when speaking to those who do commercialize the so called 'juice' of the fruit.
because they believe that the fruits were made to be consummed in their decomposed and liquid form; which equates to the state of a rotten orange; They even try to reduce the vomit smell by mixing it with juice of grapes or other fruit.

-

Just as I suspected. You might want to try using references and sources. People will be more likely to believe you.

---

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This might help with the answer to the question, 'If Humans were not reproducing 30000 years ago how is that humans are here today?' The following is a sample of what can be verified with science; ascertained truth of the facts, in regards to the original manuscripts of Genesis, - Authenticity and validity of the first instruction of Genesis - Evidences of the existence of the tree of life

Just calling a plant the "Tree of Life" doesn't make it so any more than Queen Anne's Lace has anything to do with either Queen Anne or Lace. The person who named wild lettuce Queen Anne's lace did so because it resembled Lace from the Queen Anne period. Common names of living things are just that common names.

So the question remains unanswered.

Edited by bluescat48, : added line.

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

Theodoric writes: ..People will be more likely to believe you..

-

Anything that follows a corrupted version of writings that tell many lies to the people saying that they were made by a god, elohiym; -- a generic term for deities in the Middle east--.

never made nor does it intend to make any valid point. Even when you ask a believer 'Is the word god/elohiym a Sacred--Set Apart name?' he is not able to say a yes or no answer, because even their translators of bibles were taught to tell lies.

The corrupted bibles won't help anyone to prove anything important unless a person recognizes that there's a distinction to be made between the versions and the first instruction of Genesis as originally written.

The above distinction is important because the previous posts talk about what can be verified with science,

- Authenticity and validity of the first instruction of Genesis
- Evidences of the existence of the tree of life

However, any of these two Items won't help nor be a fine thing in case you are a believer.
Which of you is able truly to say that the above two Items can not be ascertained with science?

And since I say what is true, why you still have a need to believe me rather than check the info by yourselves?

Because I tell you the truth and the truth can not be retained through believing.

-

quote:

---

Which one of you convicts me of not telling the truth?

And since I am telling you the truth, why do you not believe Me?

because whoever is of the Truth hears the words of truth;

for this reason you do not retain any words of truth,

because you are believers like your *father.

[*Legion; Ravãb; to be many].

---

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

-

bluescat48 writes: Just calling a plant the "Tree of Life" doesn't make it so

-

Of course it doesn't.
It's too easy to dismiss whether or not the tree of life is just a metaphor or really and still exists
Let's verify first the factors why this is not about a common tree

-

Is there any other tree whose root is totally golden and that has the same amount of calcium and proteins?

Is there any actual tree out there giving fruits 12 times a year?

Is there any reason why this tree of life would not be the only exception?

-

Amazingly nowhere on the internet is there any support for your assertions.

You must be a great prophet.

---

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

You have the tree of life totally wrong. But that's a common mistake.

This is the correct one:

What does whether it is a common tree or not have to do with anything?

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008