I am not trying to "appeal to authority" I am merely trying to support my opinoin with evidence.
culture is more my bag than what you refer to as "science". To me it is a double standard, but I will try anyway.
This shows the difference between Upper Egyptians, and Lower Egyptians. So really it depends on where in the country you live. The south is "less arabic" than the north even though the north is only 19.1% arabic to begin with. To me this is logical to my original thoughts because there is a considerable geographic and climatic barrier to get to egypt overland (the route Arabs would have to take to arrive), and for native Egyptians to leave. This would make the original population more isolated, and less prone to outside genitic influence.
quote:
To sum up, there doesn’t seem to be majority ‘Arab’ genetic component to the Egyptian DNA pool, 20% absolute maximum. And a lot of the non African DNA is traceable to the Neolithic farming expansion that swept across North Africa, so it would be a lot lower in reality. Egyptians are Egyptian, not Arab
my source:
Egyptians are not Arabs, they are Egyptians. | Mathilda's Anthropology Blog.
I think the originial goal of this was to combat the Afro-centrists who see the Egyptians as this once proud and powerful ancient African (black) Empire, but it also works in the context of showing the lack of Arabian DNA in Egyptians today.