Your EvC Debate Dream Team - Fantasy Debating

slevesque writes: But what I'm saying is that, in the rare case you do have a creationist who comes in saying ''I think that the world/universe/humanity was created by an intelligent being because of... 'whatever' ", you reply to him as if he had posted word-salad.

Buzsaw writes:Dr Adequate, you and the pack who've received some ideological butt kicking in threads like the Exodus thread take advantage of threads such as this to malign the one who held the skeptical Exodus pack at bay with unrefuted (albeit, debatable) evidence for 35 or so pages of robust legitimate debate.Pernicious opinions pertaining to persons posting unpopular points, opposing positions prescribed by the pack, are inappropriately posited persistently.

Buzsaw writes:When you said this:

quote:

---

Just to be clear about one other thing, a creationist is someone who holds beliefs about the real world that are based upon his religious beliefs rather than evidence.

---

....you appeared to be implying that, by definition of creationist, evidences acclaimed by creationists cannot be considered legitimate.

Buzsaw writes:There comes a time to refrain from repetitively repeated repetitions.Not once did I claim to have provided empirical evidence relative to the shallows, Dr. Jones. Your memory fails. What I did was to debate reasons why a mighty rush of sea and millenniums of time could well have eroded the shallow delta, likely created by the flood from creating the wadi canyon.Moreover, that event was relatively (I say, relatively) near the time of the flood which would have created the delta. More about that, when I find time to get back to the Exodus thread. The wee hrs, here in NY, are telling me I need some rest. Good morning.

Buzsaw writes:Nevertheless, I have at least one bonafide esteemed credentialed marine research scientist, Dr. Lennart Moller, as well as other intelligent company like Lysemachus (remember him?), his friends amd other good company sharing my delusions ABE: LYSEMAUCHUS, WHERE ARE YOU?

Buzsaw writes:My point was that if I'm delusional, so is an esteemed scientist, who did the research.How do you think he did his other scientific research, without the equipment needful for the marine aspects of it? Why do you think he invested, likely millions in a fully equipped marine ship; for pleasure purposes? I don't think so.How do you think he had the expertise and equipment, with the techy equipment aboard to do the marine research that he documented?Perhaps you could contact him and talk to him about your doubts?

Buzsaw writes:I don't think a man of his esteem would commit fraud and jeopardise his repution. Moreover, as I told Percy, if I'm delusional, he's delusional.I maintain that if secularist scientists thought they could falsify Moller, they would be there to do so.