|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,461 Year: 3,718/9,624 Month: 589/974 Week: 202/276 Day: 42/34 Hour: 5/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: All Human Beings Are Descendants of Adam | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europa Member (Idle past 4708 days) Posts: 68 Joined: |
I may be wrong but my understanding of evolution does not contradict the statement: "All human beings are descendants of Adam."
I shall explain why.Evolutionists state that we are descendants of an ape-like ancestor. To further strengthen this, they claim that the chimps and human beings share a common ancestor. I will not go into the details of explicit calims like the DNA of human beings are 99 percent similar to that of the chimps. But I am not saying that any of this is wrong. Having said that, we also have done some tests, because of which we have found out that the existing population of the world are all decendants of a single human being -- the Mitochondrial Eve (ME). I am not saying that the ME is the real Eve (of the Bible). Nor am I denying that at this point. I just do not know. The common explanation of the ME is that the human population faced a bottleneck sometime in the past. And it is because of this bottle-necking that we have the ME. That is fine. I do not disagree with this either. What I am saying is that because we have something (or should I say someone?) like the ME, the statement: 'All human beings are descendants of Adam' is not false. Coming to think of it, it would be so difficult to argue in support of my statement if we do not have the ME. Now, many will not agree with my statement. But that is a different issue for i am not arguing to prove my statement. Nevertheless, evolution does not contradict my statement.Am I wrong? I would like some insight into this and will appreciate all answers.Thanks. Edited by AdminPD, : Title Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminPD Inactive Administrator |
Thread copied here from the All Human Beings Are Descendants of Adam thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
purpledawn Member (Idle past 3479 days) Posts: 4453 From: Indiana Joined: |
quote:Yes it is. Adam from the Jewish/Christian creation story is a fictional character in a just-so type of story. He has no real descendants. How we know it is fiction: Talking snake, magic trees, people made from dirt, God discussions, etc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
The common explanation of the ME is that the human population faced a bottleneck sometime in the past. No, not really. There was a bottleneck, but that isn't why ME existed. That's just inevitable. Humans are one species, everyone has a mother, and no-one has more than one mother. Given these facts, one can prove the existence of ME from one's armchair. People often get confused about this. The fact that ME existed was not news. It was inevitable. The date and location at which she existed was news. If I was one of those scientists I'd have gotten downright testy about that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europa Member (Idle past 4708 days) Posts: 68 Joined: |
That's just inevitable. Humans are one species, everyone has a mother, and no-one has more than one mother. Given these facts, one can prove the existence of ME from one's armchair. Well, okay.I agree. So you mean evolution does confirm the fact that we are descendants of a single human being?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europa Member (Idle past 4708 days) Posts: 68 Joined: |
Well, I got your point.
So, if I revise may statement and say "We are all descendants of a single human being," does evolutionary evidence contradict my statement?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
So you mean evolution does confirm the fact that we are descendants of a single human being? Common sense confirms the fact that we are all descendants of at least two human beings. As I said, it was not big news that ME existed. She had to. Common sense also suggests that this is probably true of more than two human beings. Genetic analysis, IIRC, suggests that "Y-nuclear Adam" and "mitochondrial Eve" didn't live at the same time; which would make reconciling the facts with the Bible kinda tricky. Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
purpledawn Member (Idle past 3479 days) Posts: 4453 From: Indiana Joined: |
Europa writes: Well, I got your point.So, if I revise may statement and say "We are all descendants of a single human being," does evolutionary evidence contradict my statement? That changes the topic of the thread. If that's what you wanted to debate, then you should have worded it that way. So what's your point if it does or doesn't?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2317 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Dr Adequate writes:
Quite correct. In fact, "Adam" lived somewhere between 50.000 and 80.000 years after "Eve". Genetic analysis, IIRC, suggests that "Y-nuclear Adam" and "mitochondrial Eve" didn't live at the same time; which would make reconciling the facts with the Bible kinda tricky. Also I suggest reading Mitochondrial Eve to Europa, which explains quite clearly that ME was not the only woman alive at the time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.4 |
Others have dealt with the rest, I'm just going to concentrate on this one bit:
Having said that, we also have done some tests, because of which we have found out that the existing population of the world are all decendants of a single human being This is incorrect. No-one has ever performed a test for the existence of mitochondrial eve. Her existence is assumed based on the statistical near inevitability of it being so. What they then did have assumed she existed is apply the science of genetic molecular clocks to the data gathered on variation in mitochondiral genomes across the human population to calculate when she lived.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europa Member (Idle past 4708 days) Posts: 68 Joined: |
In fact, "Adam" lived somewhere between 50.000 and 80.000 years after "Eve". Could this not be due to something being wrong with the scientific methodology? Please, don't be too aggressive.I am just trying to make a sound argument here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europa Member (Idle past 4708 days) Posts: 68 Joined: |
Purpledawn
That changes the topic of the thread. If that's what you wanted to debate, then you should have worded it that way. My bad.But you are avoiding the answer
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europa Member (Idle past 4708 days) Posts: 68 Joined: |
Mr Jack
This is incorrect. No-one has ever performed a test for the existence of mitochondrial eve. Her existence is assumed based on the statistical near inevitability of it being so. What they then did have assumed she existed is apply the science of genetic molecular clocks to the data gathered on variation in mitochondiral genomes across the human population to calculate when she lived. Others have dealt with the rest, I'm just going to concentrate on this one bit: Having said that, we also have done some tests, because of which we have found out that the existing population of the world are all decendants of a single human being This is incorrect. No-one has ever performed a test for the existence of mitochondrial eve. Her existence is assumed based on the statistical near inevitability of it being so. What they then did have assumed she existed is apply the science of genetic molecular clocks to the data gathered on variation in mitochondiral genomes across the human population to calculate when she lived. Thanks for the info.Is this also the method they use to say that there is a Y-chromosomal Adam?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2317 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Europa writes:
While, of course, anything is possible, the likelihood of this being the case is very small indeed. At this point in time, with all the knowledge we have, there is no way "Adam" and "Eve" lived at the same time. Of course when there is new data, this can always change, but until then, we should assume that this is correct, regardless of what we would like to believe about such things.
Could this not be due to something being wrong with the scientific methodology? Please, don't be too aggressive.
Of course. If you read the link I posted, you will see there explained that ME wasn't the only woman alive at the time, she is just the only woman with an unbroken female line until the present day. Just like "Adam" is the only man with an unbroken male line until the present.I am just trying to make a sound argument here. I'll try to dig up a video about it this evening.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europa Member (Idle past 4708 days) Posts: 68 Joined: |
Dr Adequate
Genetic analysis, IIRC, suggests that "Y-nuclear Adam" and "mitochondrial Eve" didn't live at the same time; which would make reconciling the facts with the Bible kinda tricky. You are quick to jump into a 'reconciliation' story.Having said that, you are also assuming that there are no flaws in the scientific method that arrives at these conclusions. As far as I know, the scientific methods used to calculate the times of existence of ME and Y-chromosomal Adam are not 100 percent foolproof. There is a lot of margin for error. (More so than most other scientific calculations such as the age of the Earth, time of Big Bang, etc). Why then, are you so qiick to quip that reconciling the facts with the Bible would be kinda tricky?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024