|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 3375 days) Posts: 175 From: Klamath Falls, OR Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: how to quote a message? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ApostateAbe Member (Idle past 3375 days) Posts: 175 From: Klamath Falls, OR Joined: |
I edited the OBEY post to add more colors for ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD, and I see a lot of blackness below that post in Firefox, much like in the screenshot, but it looks strangely normal in Chrome.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 5647 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: Member Rating: 6.8 |
You broke it again. Looks okay in IE, but not with firefox.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 19887 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.9 |
The nesting limit for Firefox probably applies to anything. A <table> is a level, a <div> is a level, a list (<ol>, <ul>) is a level, etc.
--Percy
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Director Posts: 3933 Joined: |
The first message, then as quoted in the second message which contains a coding error:
-----The first message is below-----
The very things you criticize science for are the very things that make up objectivity. The idea behind objectivity is to verify you ideas by pointing to something real and tangible that is the same for everyone. It is necessarily limited by our own limitations. It seems to me that you want to be able to point to something that can't be verified and still call it objective. It doesn't work that way.
You never explain why this is not logical. Why can't an organism capable or reasoning come from a natural process with no intelligence behind it?
That is a strange analogy to use given the fact that science has allowed us to "see" wavelengths of light that our eyes can not directly detect. Science has allowed us to see galaxies that can not be seen by the naked eye, bacteria that are too small to be seen, and deconstruct the very atoms that make up matter. On top of that, science has allowed us to cure blindness.
Examples?
Why isn't it scientific?
The only argument you have put forth for this is an argument based on incredulity. That is, your inability to accept the idea that nature can produce a species capable of reasoning. From this inability you then proceed to assert the existence of an entity for which there is zero evidence. This is very poor logic.
Based on what evidence?
Ask yourself why you don't believe that Thor uses a great hammer to create thunder and you will have the answer. -----The second message is below----- [qs=Taq]
You never explain why this is not logical. Why can't an organism capable or reasoning come from a natural process with no intelligence behind it? For the same reason symphonies are not composed and arranged without some intelligence behind it. For the same reason wrong does not equal right, and eternal lack has no means to become anything but lack, which is nothing.
The only argument you have put forth for this is an argument based on incredulity. That is, I explained in the beginning that I wouldn't be giving -----End of quoted messages----- I did not use any quote coding myself, because the above error(s) might blotch it up also. Compare the two messages - See how "Who is saying what" is hard to tell and/or easily to misinterpret? It would take quite an effort for an admin to fix the mess. Adminnemooseus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Director Posts: 3933 Joined: |
The following is a copy of the entire message. The first big box seems OK, but the second big box is a mess. Code fixing is pending; Chances are it's a small thing, but finding that small thing may be a trick - Adminnemooseus
I am not YEC. (young earth creationist) You might call me, YAHC, i.e. young animal and humanity creationists. Why is it important to designate? Because of the dating data. The rocks and even plants were created (day three) before the sun, (day four) according to the Genesis record. According to Genesis, the day length determination was not until the sun was created. Likely, this also was true concerning the insect world, in that plants would have needed them to pollinate etc.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : For some unknown reason, "big" seem.s to want to be spelled "bix"
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021