Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,814 Year: 4,071/9,624 Month: 942/974 Week: 269/286 Day: 30/46 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How do scientists explain the cause of the Ice Age(s)?
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4172 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 77 of 96 (606791)
02-28-2011 12:02 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by Theodoric
02-28-2011 11:31 AM


Re: excavated?
Look into the Zanclean flood theory. It says that the med was filled gradually over several months up too 2 years about 5.33 million years ago Now as I understand it wasn't the first time the med had water though, just the last time it was filled. Wiki has links you can check out and see what you think. Also you can look into the geology of the med and how it was thought to be formed and when.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Theodoric, posted 02-28-2011 11:31 AM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Theodoric, posted 02-28-2011 12:14 PM fearandloathing has replied
 Message 79 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-28-2011 12:20 PM fearandloathing has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4172 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 80 of 96 (606807)
02-28-2011 12:43 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by Theodoric
02-28-2011 12:14 PM


Re: excavated?
Yes I understand you do. sorry I guess I was trying to provide this theory to support what you were saying. I guess I should ve replied to original statement about fast flowing water. I am still learning how to utilize this site effectively, sorry for any confusion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Theodoric, posted 02-28-2011 12:14 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4172 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 81 of 96 (606808)
02-28-2011 12:43 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by Theodoric
02-28-2011 12:14 PM


Re: excavated?
Yes I understand you do. sorry I guess I was trying to provide this theory to support what you were saying. I guess I should ve replied to original statement about fast flowing water. I am still learning how to utilize this site effectively, sorry for any confusion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Theodoric, posted 02-28-2011 12:14 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4172 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 83 of 96 (606819)
02-28-2011 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Robert Byers
02-28-2011 5:36 AM


Robert Byers writes:
its a common mention in books dealing with the origin of the Med sea.
Not creationist material.
What books? Please cite at least a few verifiable source for your claim that it is common. Why don't you read a little on the geology of the med. Take the time to skim over material from several sources and let me know where you find anything to support what you say is common. You will see the med has had water prior to 12 million years ago and dried up until 5 million years ago, or are those dates too old and therefore irrelevant lies that science teaches us??

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Robert Byers, posted 02-28-2011 5:36 AM Robert Byers has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024