Problems with evolution? Submit your questions.

No, there is also genetic drift and horizontal gene transfer.

How do you falsify the evo dogma?

By gathering evidence that it cannot explain. And it's not dogma.

What is "something else?" - what do you mean here,Do you mean another variety (among the already evolved vast number of existing varieties) of cow, where one variety is visibly different from another?Do you mean another species of bovine?

Birds seem to still be dinos, just one of the species of dinos. Humans seem to still be primates, just one of the species of primates.

It's not evolution's fault that you can't think of such a piece of evidence. I'll give you a hint: A pegasus horse would falsify evolution as we know it. It wuold of course not prove creationism, but something about the theory would have to be changed.

No, science does not just say things and expect you to believe them -- that would be dogma -- instead science relies on objective empirical evidence to show that it happens.That is why you need evidence that {X} cannot be explained by evolutionary processes.Note that science does not prove theories, rather it tests them to see if they can be falsified. People - including scientists - have tried to falsify evolution for over 150 years with no success yet.In science theories are the best explanations for the known evidence, and every new test either adds to the evidence that is explained, or it invalidates the theory, which then needs to be revised to include the new evidence. This is how science works to increase knowledge of how things work.

But true. It was just an example. You could also try to find a crustacean with mamary glands, that would also do it.

Did you look at the information I supplied for the classification of Homo sapiens sapiens?

How fortunate it is that science is not limited by the inability of creationists to think of things

A majory violation of the nested hierarchy would be obvious to everyone, and it would be allowable for ID/creationism. So why don't we see any?

Did you have a point, or are you just whining?

Behe never demonstrated that IC systems could not evolve. In fact, IC systems were predicted to be a product of evolution in 1918:

It will never happen. You don't evolve out of your ancestry. In the tree of life you are always a part of the branch you came from. You never clip yourself off from a branch and attach somewhere else. What can happen is that the biodiversity of cows can increase, and perhaps even new species of cow will evolve. Think of all the dog breeds that have emerged from their wolf ancestors and how the wolf is still a dog as are all of the dog breed.

It's a fair bet that anyone being grossly and foolishly wrong about evolution is a creationist. However, if you will tell us that you are not a creationist, and what you are instead, then I shall believe you, because you are of course deluded when you pretend that I am dogmatic on this subject.

If you meant dissent, then again you are simply wrong to claim science discourages dissent.