How do scientists explain the cause of the Ice Age(s)?

This YEC creationist says the ice ages should more accurately be seen as a freezing rain age.
I see this age as coming about the years 2100 BC to 1900 BC and lasting till about 1700 BC or so.
i speculate there was a great upheaval some centuries after the flood , these dates, and part of it was a great volcanic outporing up and down the spine of North/South America and elsewhere.
This changed the climate, like a nuclear winter, and brought about the cool and rainy climate that we now call the ice age.
I believe ice cores and the general ice depth in northern parts was rather quickly done by endless rain cycles as opposed to annual snow cycles.
So there was not a movement from migrating ice but simply frozen water covering everywhere.
Then the ice melted rapidly in great floods and all was over and nothing happened since.Its just been wrong interpretations about basic facts and processes from those not first accepting biblical boundaries.

No problem and in fact these days they are used to demonstrate that it was all from mega floods and not slow moving glaciers.

The evidence is the same evidence as used now to draw conclusions. Just a better interpretation is given here.
There are only basic pieces of evidence in these things actually.

The bible deals only with basic info for its agenda.
Those lands would not be close to the action here.

Studies on mega floods show almost all formations in sediment or bedrock are from fast flowing water. That is the votices and other mechanisms within the flow. even Drumlins are seen now as from mega floods.

In fact it is said that the Med sea was carved out by fast flowing water into it. They put it in a earlier age then the glacial period but still its all about the sea being created by water surges.
I'm by the way not saying the melting of the ice was what carved out the med. i see it as from a world event a few centuries after the great flood. There was a rise in sea levels everywhere. This from a great upheaval on continents as I see it.
anyways the point is YES the Med was created by incoming water.

When ever it came in the BC it still was a excavation of the land that created the Med sea. Before it was dry land which allowed rapid animal migration. in fact they find concentrations of creatures, post flood, killed and collected in some islands showing they were overthrown by this event.

its a common mention in books dealing with the origin of the Med sea.
Not creationist material.

I only meant the mega floods created certain earth geography. I meant that the melted ice was the origin of the mega floods. not noahs flood.
It was a example of how mega floods are now seen to have done massive instand work.

They do talk anout great canyons and other evidence on the floor showing powerful moving water.
anyways it would be from some carving and then possibly some infilling from other events.
Let its the new big thing about the origin of the med.

The material would be the origin of the areas in North africa. in fact the material for the pyramids. I imagine water carving out a basin and depositing material on the sides and then some infilling from the mts in europe filling it in again. The origin for fossil life above the k-t line north and south of the Med is from this event as i see iot and it fits biblical boundaries.

its new ideas that water flooded into the area in a big way and anyways it filled the area up with water.
It simply was so powerful it lowered the basin and threw the sediment on top of the boundaries.
The great fossil assemblages on all sides i see as from this short event about a century or two after the flood.

The evidence is the fossils. tHey show them being covered quickly by sediment. this is a post flood event. So it was from the water crashing into the med area. Deepening a bit and in some areas carving great chunks of it out. It deposited much material on its banks.