|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What IS evidence of design? (CLOSING STATEMENTS ONLY) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Mr Jack writes: Okay, I'll expand (and refine a little, thinking about it) An artefact can be identified as designed if: 1. It can be identified as having a purpose or function to a third party2. That third party influenced the form of the artefact 3. That influence was intentional So an object that has no obvious function cannot be described as designed - an amorphous lump of rock is not designed, for example (fails on 1). Whereas as elephant poo could be said to have a function to a dung beatle but the dung beatle is incapable of influencing the elephant poo in any way, so elephant poo is not designed (passes 1, fails 2). Criteria 3 is there to root out symbiosis, and co-evolution - aphids did not design Buchnera, Buchnera did not design aphids. (Oh, and I see I missed the 'y' in party off my previous post, oops) So consider honeycombs, a termite mound and a birds nest. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1405 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Hi Mr Jack
An artefact can be identified as designed if: 1. It can be identified as having a purpose or function to a third party2. That third party influenced the form of the artefact 3. That influence was intentional So an object that has no obvious function cannot be described as designed - an amorphous lump of rock is not designed, for example (fails on 1). Whereas as elephant poo could be said to have a function to a dung beatle but the dung beatle is incapable of influencing the elephant poo in any way, so elephant poo is not designed (passes 1, fails 2). Criteria 3 is there to root out symbiosis, and co-evolution - aphids did not design Buchnera, Buchnera did not design aphids. But does it rule out co-evolution? Aphids cultivated and domesticated by ants? Hummingbirds and long pistle flowers, the long tongued hawk moth Manduca rustica in Madagascar, with the star orchid that only can be fertilized by that specific moth and the moth has no other need for that long a tongue except to pollinate that flower. Not an artifact, but certainly a modified for a function tool. Enjoy http://www.fs.fed.us/...inator-of-the-month/hawk_moths.shtml by our ability to understand Rebel American Zen Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
fearandloathing writes: So if I understand your line of thought then a mouse has no significant difference in intelligence or ability to reason compared to a chimp or bonobo? Nothing compared to the gap between mouse and humans. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.7 |
jar writes: So consider honeycombs, a termite mound and a birds nest. Why? I think my definition puts them as designed. Do you not?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.7 |
Can they be said to be intentional?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fearandloathing Member (Idle past 4145 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: |
I think the honeycomb may be simply the best arrangement to utilize most storage space possible. Its also strong, but I don't feel it it designed by the bee or god. With that line of thought you could argue the beaver-dam and few other things too.
You can wiki honeycomb and follow the links to Archimedes lab and see some interesting stuff and even a way the design could be better in theory but in practice the difference is negligible. Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.7 |
I think bee colonies design their hives. The hexagonal shape itself isn't but the arrangement is varied according to the environment and needs of the colony.
I can't see a sensible reason to think beavers aren't engaged in design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fearandloathing Member (Idle past 4145 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: |
I guess we would have to agree on what design means to this discussion...wiki wasn't very helpful.. lol.
Maybe someone smarter than I has a definition that would be acceptable?? I shall look a little further.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.7 |
I would suggest other peoples definitions are minimally useful here. Perhaps you could pick a suitable case - such as the beaver - and explain why you think it is not design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fearandloathing Member (Idle past 4145 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: |
LOL...well there are many too choose from. I will put some thought into it. Maybe you see one that you think is more relevant?
I work in construction/maintenance < plumbing , pipefitting ect.., so I am biased. I veiw design as when I walk into a new house...look at prints and then lay-out where stuff goes. I have to design that system to work well and meet code. There are other considerations such as doing it cost effective ie...least number of fittings and pipe. Then there are considerations of ease of use or access for maintainence, and of couse what the customer wants. After all that the end product is my design based on many different reqirements, but rarely do I have to put it in the form of a blueprint. I am not sure I can say the beaver is not simply working on instinct.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fearandloathing Member (Idle past 4145 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: |
I honestly cant say beavers don't design at this point.
I will say that it is not a design process that uses engineering in a method to get a end result. As a child I built many forts and a tree house using trial and error. I didn't have no understanding of how much load a piece of wood could withstand, but common sense and erring on the side of caution worked well for me then. By some definitions I was still actively designing. Could the use of tools , in order to complete a design be appropriate? Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
fearandloathing writes:
I agree. Bees are round and they make bee-shaped holes to store their honey in. It just so happens that when you "stack" round holes, you get a honeycomb. I think the honeycomb is more akin to the snowflake than to anything designed. I think the honeycomb may be simply the best arrangement to utilize most storage space possible. Its also strong, but I don't feel it it designed by the bee or god. You can have brevity and clarify, or you can have accuracy and detail, but you can't easily have both. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fearandloathing Member (Idle past 4145 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: |
fearandloathing writes: I honestly cant say beavers don't design at this point. I will say that it is not a design process that uses engineering in a method to get a end result. As a child I built many forts and a tree house using trial and error. I didn't have no understanding of how much load a piece of wood could withstand, but common sense and erring on the side of caution worked well for me then. By some definitions I was still actively designing. Could the use of tools , in order to complete a design be appropriate? I will answer myself...lol....sign of mental instability or not??? Tool use means nothing. I can design and build a shelter with no tools...sticks vines and leaves maybe...snow cave ect... Maybe in this case an argument can be made by how the materials are utilized?? Most designs will utilize materials available in an orderly and efficient way as to reduce waste and improve efficiency of said design or ease of constuction...whether it be labor or energy used.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6408 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
jar writes:
I don't have a problem saying that those are designed. But it depends on what is meant by "design." I would consider them ad hoc designs. That is, they are built up, and adjusted as needed, but there is no explicit prior plan or blueprint.So consider honeycombs, a termite mound and a birds nest. Edited by nwr, : Fix typo (inserted word marked in red) Jesus was a liberal hippie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
nwr writes: jar writes:
I don't have a problem saying that those are designed. But it depends on what is meant by "design." I would consider them ad hoc designs. That is, they are built up, and adjusted as needed, but there is explicit prior plan or blueprint.So consider honeycombs, a termite mound and a birds nest. Can we also see the actual production and producers and then can we infer that like arrowheads, pottery and Stonehenge that ancient examples of honeycombs, termite mounds or nests had similar origins? Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024