Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,402 Year: 3,659/9,624 Month: 530/974 Week: 143/276 Day: 17/23 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   evolution and the extinction of dinos
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 18 of 93 (607387)
03-03-2011 12:36 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Dr Adequate
03-03-2011 12:13 PM


Re: The fossil record
Please tell me if my line of thinking is way off. Wouldn't all species be transitional to some extent. Evolution and natural selection processes always are causing change.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Dr Adequate, posted 03-03-2011 12:13 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by ZenMonkey, posted 03-03-2011 8:41 PM fearandloathing has not replied
 Message 21 by Peter, posted 03-04-2011 5:41 AM fearandloathing has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


(1)
Message 49 of 93 (608180)
03-09-2011 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Robert Byers
03-08-2011 4:57 AM


Robert Byers writes:
Its been a great gain for YEC creationism to have the impact thing arive to explain the great fauna/flora change in the world suddenly.
this creationist sees the k-t line as the flood line.
so what did for us is to demonstrate a instant die off and a dramatic and different recovery in a point in history.
We simply say this was the biblical flood.
A great die off and different recovery in fauna/flora.
The impact is simply misunderstood as to when it happened.
HI RB.
Please explain the amount of Iridium in the KT boundary, as it is one of the rarest elements on earth but is common in asteroids.
Then explain shocked Quartz, as it cant be made by anything but a large meteor strike or a nuclear explosion.
Then explain the tektites found in the KT boundary.
Then you can tell me how the great flood created an impact crater near Chicxulub Mexico on the Yucatan peninsula.
Lets not forger the chromium isotope anomaly in the KT.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Robert Byers, posted 03-08-2011 4:57 AM Robert Byers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Robert Byers, posted 03-10-2011 2:56 AM fearandloathing has replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 57 of 93 (608416)
03-10-2011 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by Robert Byers
03-10-2011 2:56 AM


moronic answer
Your "answers" are at best entertaining. And you failed to explain my other questions at all, you fail to provide any scientific proof, and you just cant answer the ones that are too hard, probably because you cant find a YEC website that has any reference to my questions.
Now you should read a little about shocked quartz, it wasn't formed that way, it became shocked due to large impact, or explosion...nuclear sized...floods don't do that. Your reference to diamonds doesn't explain anything about how quartz became shocked quartz.
As you said earlier...creationist don't accept the timeline the rest of us accept, therefor no point in trying to talk to you in any meaningful way. Your view of the world around you is limited by your beliefs, that makes you too narrow-minded in my opinion.
Please cite some biblical reference for vulcanism during time of great flood?? If its not in your great "history" book then how can you prove it was happening?? Cant use real science because its time line means nothing, so must be in the bible.
Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Robert Byers, posted 03-10-2011 2:56 AM Robert Byers has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 61 of 93 (608493)
03-10-2011 4:19 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by ringo
03-10-2011 10:29 AM


ringo writes:
Robert Byers writes:
The fauna below the k-t line or as this creationist sees it the flood line is exactly what one should expect to find.
Are you one of those creationists who believes that there were dinosaurs on the ark? If so, they must have gone extinct after the flood - i.e. you'd expect to find dinosaur fossils above the K-T/flood line.
I'll play devils advocate for a minute and field that one....The great flood unearthed the bones of dinosaurs as it was digging out areas like the mediterranean sea...depositing them on top of the KT layer......JUST don't ask me how some of them remained intact instead of just a random mix of bones spread around haphazardly. Even if you did I would tell you it is empirical proof there is a god, cause he must of reassembled them in his infinite wisdom, as proof he is real and placed them back the way they were....under the KT layer ......or some gibberish like that.
Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by ringo, posted 03-10-2011 10:29 AM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 83 of 93 (615291)
05-12-2011 4:56 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by Robert Byers
05-12-2011 4:00 AM


Byres writes:
I say seals are just bears. They look alike somewhat but there is a difference.
That is the one of the most far out things I have heard in long time, one for the peanut gallery.
Would you like to provide any evidence of this, what you think means absolutely nothing.

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Robert Byers, posted 05-12-2011 4:00 AM Robert Byers has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024