evolution and the extinction of dinos

Not actually a potential, more a fact. They do show traits that are intermediary.Edited by jar, : appalin spallin

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Once again Buz you are simply posting falsehoods.First, the Biblical Flood has been refuted. Period. Anyone that claims there was a Biblical Flood is simply wrong.Second, no one has ever explained how the Biblical Flood could produce the evidence we see related to glaciers.Are you actually going to present some evidence in this case?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

So you have no evidence.Thought so.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

No Buz, it can't. First the Biblical Flood has been refuted, it never happened. Claiming it happened is simply repeating falsehoods.Second, an asteroid strike cannot be interpreted as supportive of the Biblical Flood because the myth tells us how that happened; it says it rained.Third, there is nothing in the Genesis 2&3 curse of the serpent that can in anyway be connected to dinosaurs.Fourth, there is NO connection to be found anywhere between the myth found in Genesis 2&3 and teh myth of the Biblical Flood.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Please explain how a flood can put down a layer high in Iridium.You are free of course, to continue to claim all the false nonsense you want.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Huh?Sorry but that just sounds like word salad.Transitional means showing intermediary traits.Honestly, there is no need for any additional evidence FOR evolution, Evolution is as close to being proven as any science will ever be.What transitional fossils help us understand are the details, the minutia.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Read what I wrote. I said "Honestly, there is no need for any additional evidence FOR evolution, Evolution is as close to being proven as any science will ever be."If you want to play silly word games do so with someone else. I left the kindergarten playground long ago.Next you seem to be playing yet another word game."antecedent/descendent" and "pre-post" are not synonymous.Transitional characteristics are import in understanding the details of evolution. A good example is the mammalian middle ear. Recent discoveries of a small chipmunk (I've always loved the little striped things) like critter that lived around 120 million years ago gave us some exciting information. Now mammals weren't something new 120 million years ago, they had already been around almost that long before. But this little chipmunk size critter had a strange but well preserved middle ear. That's unusual because little bones like those in the middle ear don't often get preserved.Now Mao (I call him Mao even though his real name is Maotherium asiaticus) had a relatively primitive middle ear, partly reptilian, partly mammalian. We know that there were earlier mammals with a more mammalian middle ear. We don't know (and really don't much care) whether Mao was a direct ancestor of any living species.So what did we learn? We learned that the evolution of the mammalian middle ear was not a straight line affair, that there were either several different branches, multiple examples of the trait evolving or the trait evolving and regressing.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

What I hope you learned was that evolution is change over time, and not necessarily "antecedent/descendent" or "pre-post".And no matter how much evidence you disregard ID will never be a viable model.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

We know that you are ignorant, but that can be cured.There is nothing in the Biblical Flood myths about volcanism, so stop misrepresenting the Bible. You have read the Bible haven't you?There is nothing in the Biblical Flood myths about any rock creation, so stop misrepresenting the Bible. You have read the Bible haven't you?There is nothing in the Biblical Flood myths about sorting, so stop misrepresenting the Bible. You have read the Bible haven't you?In addition, the Biblical Flood has been totally refuted and anyone that continues to claim it happened is simply spreading falsehoods and lies.Finally, the Biblical Flood myths have NOTHING to do with the topic and are just another attempt to palm the pea, misdirect the audience and create attractive rabbit holes.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

It all depends on which one of the Biblical Flood myths you want to credit.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!