Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On Transitional Species (SUMMATION MESSAGES ONLY)
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4409
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 158 of 314 (605967)
02-22-2011 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by Robert Byers
02-22-2011 8:13 PM


crawling with bits and pieces
Robert Byers writes:
my point is that creatures do not have anatomical evidence of having once different types of bodies showing a different lifestyle.
Yet if evolution was true they should be crawling with bits and pieces.
This is not correct. They are crawling with bits and pieces.
Mammals have hair and mammary glands, that are bits and pieces that were inherited from their ancestral lineage back to the first Mammals.
Mammals have a skeletal system, and a respiratory system, and a circulatory system, and a digestive system, and a nervous system and these, and everything else, are the bits and pieces that were inherited from their ancestral lineages.
All the animals alive today fit into nested hierarchies of traits (bits and pieces) that they inherited from their ancestral lineages.
It is those bits and pieces that we use to study and classify all living creatures. And we have millions of fossils that also fit into those nested hierarchies and show us how those lineages have changed and branched over the history of life on our planet.
You are making wild pronouncements that are based on no evidence at all and that, in fact, totally ignores all the evidence that has been gathered and studied by countless scientists for the last couple centuries.
I learned this in 7th grade science, where were you?

Tactimatically speaking, the molecubes are out of alignment. -- S.Valley
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Robert Byers, posted 02-22-2011 8:13 PM Robert Byers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by Robert Byers, posted 02-24-2011 2:04 AM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4409
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 216 of 314 (607568)
03-04-2011 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by Robert Byers
03-03-2011 3:03 AM


Re: Exceptio Probat Regulam
Robert Byers writes:
My assertion is well founded on reasoning used by evolution proponents.
I am going to go out on a limb here....You never took Biology in school, did you? If you did you certainly did not get an A. English Composition clearly was not your best class either.
We all have eyes from a common design. Yet its not a sign of biological relatedness.
Have you ever read a biology book or a book about evolutionary biology? If you did you must have had your eyes from a common design tightly closed.
EVIDENCE. Do you know what this word means? How about supporting your assertions with evidence that you even know anything about science or evolutionary biology. Repeating the same silly gibberish over and over does not support your argument.
What are you trying to accomplish here?

Tactimatically speaking, the molecubes are out of alignment. -- S.Valley
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by Robert Byers, posted 03-03-2011 3:03 AM Robert Byers has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4409
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(1)
Message 271 of 314 (608456)
03-10-2011 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 258 by Robert Byers
03-10-2011 5:12 AM


Re: Kind of The Point ....
Robert Byers writes:
There is no biology going on . Biology is about the biology of a living being. A cast of one is bad enough. but conclusions based on a succession of casts is simply not worthy of the prestige of biological research.
Emphasis mine.
This is a joke, right?
So far, in every one of your posts that I have read, you have shown that you have no clue what biology is, or for that matter what evolution is.
This is a science forum. You are expected to provide evidence for your assertions and to show that you have at least some understanding of the subjects you are addressing.
Your assertions are simply not worthy of the prestige of arguments. What are you trying to accomplish here and who are you trying (and failing) to convince?

Tactimatically speaking, the molecubes are out of alignment. -- S.Valley
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 258 by Robert Byers, posted 03-10-2011 5:12 AM Robert Byers has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024