On Transitional Species (SUMMATION MESSAGES ONLY)

Well you keep coming back that present features of bodies are the vestigial remains of the previous type of body .

Then i add that its unreasonable, unlikely, impossible that in all the evolution claimed to have taken place there is almost no remnants of previous bodies in living/fossil creatures.

You are wrong once again Percy. The purpose of the appendix has been known for some time. It is a storage area for helpful bacteria in the digestive tract.

I guess since you don't know about this, you also don't know that science still does not have a shred of evidence to support your speculation that small random mutations can add up in complexity to form larger functioning systems. Not any evidence at all.The only thing scientific about your theory is that it can't be demonstrated or verified scientifically.

A notion ain't evidence.

in fact in order to discover species flowing into/out of each other over time is founded not on biology but presumptions that geology shows this time too have taken place.

there is not biological evidence for evolution.

I have to disagree with you there. If they have a useful function then they are as much a candidate for design as descent, as I pointed out in my previous post. It is only a "fact" that they're diminished in structure and function from their original form if you take evolution as a given, which is begging the question.

Darwin INSISTED that without the presumptions of geology a reader was wasting his time reading his books on evolution.

if the fossil record did not show time sequences and so claimed biological sequences evolutionism would hardly have anything to talk about regarding evidence.

I think i'm right here.

The operative word is ONCE. if not alive and stripped down to mere bone/cast of bone one has no biology anymore.
biology is about the glorious biological systems of living life. its not about mere remains from simple bone creations. The creatures are dead because of the ending of biological systems and their complete decay.
You are not doing biology in studying fossils.
You are simply drawing conclusions about former biological systems located in individual creatures.comparing anatomy, by way of fossils, is just comparing a special case of bone material remains. its not biology or zoology .
Why do you think it is?biology demand tools and opportunity to examine actual biological life.
evolution has never done this relative to its great claims.
Casts of skeletons of former life in rock strata claims of progressive time intervals can not invoke the prestige of biologists who deal with life systems before our eyes.
This is a logical flaw of evolution in any claim of using biological evidence.

Well they said genes were the same on important points about sonar for bats and whales etc.

this still is a great point for like mechanism equals like genetic score and so its a later adaptation and its from innate triggers in the body and not wild mutation chances.

Yet its not biology. Its just questions about some critter.

Biology isn't being done where geology and casts therein are the only things to be studied.