Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,810 Year: 3,067/9,624 Month: 912/1,588 Week: 95/223 Day: 6/17 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Stonehenge Limestone Conodonts
GarryDenke 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 16
From: Drums, PA
Joined: 10-15-2003


Message 1 of 27 (61003)
10-15-2003 12:20 PM


But only one theory embraces all 3 Stonehenge Phase I, II, and III models,
inclusive of the first stone hedge of Stonehenge, its elder white limestone.
Doctor Garry Denke, Dentist (1622-1699)
-Stonehenge Great White Teeth Theory-
1) Stonehenge Great White Phase I Fish Teeth (outer limestone conodonts)
(see Carboniferous Limestone palaeontology below)
No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/gsc/calgary/labs/images/conodont.jpg
2) Stonehenge Great White Phase II Shark Teeth (double row bluestones)
Compare Double Row Proportional Sized Girths:
Compare Double Row Proportional Sized Girths:
Page not found - Blue Water Hunter
3) Stonehenge Great White Phase III Baby Teeth (central younger sarsens)
Conodonts (Paleozoic fish teeth) are prolific in the first stones hauled to Stonehenge in its Phase I construction, the foreign Carboniferous (Paleozoic) Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation quarried rock. However, conodonts were extinct by Mesozoic time, therefore they are not present in the local in situ Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation, the geologic outcrop rock of Stonehenge. Presence of conodonts (Paleozoic fish teeth) in these first stones brought to Stonehenge set the motif for its Phase II construction, the great white shark teeth model (in bluestones from across the Wales blue sea), and for its Phase III construction, the ten (10) baby teeth of the mother giving birth to them. Ten (10) was a significant number to the ancients whose young had ten (10) upper baby teeth, ten (10 lower baby teeth, ten (10) upper baby fingers, and ten (10) lower baby toes. The proportional girth sizes of Stonehenge Sarsens 51-60 to ten (10) baby teeth unified the Garry Whilhelm Denke 1656 dental theory with the Anthony M. Perks and Darlene Marie Bailey 2002 birth canal theory as one in the same through Man's Evolution of Teeth, e.g., Phase I conodonts fish teeth, Phase II great white shark teeth, and Phase III male/female baby teeth. Note the baby tongue 'Altar Stone' below.
Compare Ten (10) Proportional Sized Girths:
Compare Ten (10) Proportional Sized Girths:
Compare Ten (10) Proportional Sized Girths:
Chronology of Stonehenge Construction Materials Used:
The first (1st) discovered by Dr. Garry Whilhelm Denke (1656)
The oldest limestone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Early Carboniferous Period, Arundian Age, calcium carbonates. The Early Carboniferous Period limestone sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 340 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Birnbeck Limestone Formation (Stonehenge Whitestones).
The outcrop sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Cretaceous Period, Santonian Age, calcium carbonates. The Late Cretaceous Period outcrop sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) local in situ construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 85 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Seaford Chalk Formation (Stonehenge White Chalk).
The volcanic rocks (oldest geologically) at Stonehenge are the Ordovician Period intrusive igneous diabases (dolerites), and extrusive igneous felsites (rhyolites) and tuffs (basic). The Ordovician Period igneous rocks comprise the second (2nd) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 470 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Ordovician Volcanics (Stonehenge Bluestones).
The oldest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Silurian-Devonian Period micaceous sandstones. The Silurian-Devonian Period sedimentary sandstone rocks comprise the third (3rd) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 417 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Old Red Sandstone Formation (Stonehenge Coshestons).
The youngest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Oligocene-Miocene (Tertiary) Period silicates. The Oligocene-Miocene Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the fourth (4th) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 24 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Reading Formation (Stonehenge Sarsens).
Page not found - British Geological Survey
1/4 Stonehenge Counterscarp, 3/4 Stonehenge Mound, and Bottom 1/2 Heelstone Ditch contain Conodonts:
Current Locations of the First Stones brought to Stonehenge:
~800,000 pounds ~400 tons ~8,510 cubic-feet of foreign limestone
a) 1/4 Counterscarp still in place is foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock.
b) 3/4 Counterscarp remnants are foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock. Note: 3/4 Counterscarp rebuilt with local earth soil after 3/4 Counterscarp limestone was removed and piled at Stonehenge mound located 100 meters East-Southeast of Heel Stone.
c) E-SE Stonehenge Artifact Burial mound is foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock. Source: 3/4 of the original complete circle of Counterscarp limestone first (1st) stone hedge of Stonehenge.
d) 56 Aubrey Hole remnants are foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock.
e) Heel Stone ditch bottom-half is foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock, and not silted in fill. Source: Counterscarp causeway or Stonehenge mound.
Palaeontology, geochemistry, and mineralogy of Carboniferous age limestone is different than that of Cretaceous age chalk, and has been verified by evolution and extinction of species. Many of the elder white stone fossils died out long before the Cretaceous, and likewise, many of the younger white chalk fossils did not evolve until the Jurassic, or at the earliest, Triassic. Differentiating fossiliferous white limestone from fossiliferous white chalk was a simple task for the ancient fossil collectors. Some of the key fossils are quite huge before they were fragmented and moved.
01) Aclisina
02) Aviculopecten
03) Bellerophon
04) Caninia cornucopiae
05) Chondrites
06) Cleiothyridina roissyi
07) Composita
08) Conocardium
09) Delepinea (Daviesiella) destinezi
10) Euphemites
11) Girvanella
12) Hapsiphyllum (Zaphrentis) konincki
13) Linoproductus
14) Megachonetes papilionaceous
15) Michelina grandis
16) Mourlonia
17) Murchisonia
18) Palaeosmilia
19) Plicochonetes
20) Rhipidomella michelini
21) Schellwienella cf. S. crenistria
22) Straparollus
23) Syringopora
24) Zoophycos
Kind regards,
Garry William Denke
Geologist/Geophysicist

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by roxrkool, posted 10-15-2003 12:52 PM GarryDenke has replied
 Message 3 by John, posted 10-15-2003 1:53 PM GarryDenke has not replied
 Message 4 by Yaro, posted 10-15-2003 2:28 PM GarryDenke has replied
 Message 12 by custard, posted 06-26-2004 5:12 AM GarryDenke has not replied
 Message 15 by pink sasquatch, posted 06-27-2004 6:45 PM GarryDenke has replied

roxrkool
Member (Idle past 988 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 2 of 27 (61006)
10-15-2003 12:52 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by GarryDenke
10-15-2003 12:20 PM


Interesting post, Garry (presenting something I haven't seen before), but I'm confused - is this a response to another post?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GarryDenke, posted 10-15-2003 12:20 PM GarryDenke has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by GarryDenke, posted 10-15-2003 3:16 PM roxrkool has not replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 27 (61020)
10-15-2003 1:53 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by GarryDenke
10-15-2003 12:20 PM


It is interesting, but I am a bit confused as well as to what you are presenting. You start with shark teeth, so I tought you were implying that the builders were shark worshippers. Then you present what looks like human teeth, which matcht the Stonehenge stone pattern. Then it starts to look as if you are talking about fossils found in the stone blocks used in ST's construction.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GarryDenke, posted 10-15-2003 12:20 PM GarryDenke has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6495 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 4 of 27 (61025)
10-15-2003 2:28 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by GarryDenke
10-15-2003 12:20 PM


I think stonehenge is a giant astrolabe.
http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~js/ast222/images/astrolabe.gif
Check out the layout of the device and compare it to stonehenge, the similarity is uncanny!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GarryDenke, posted 10-15-2003 12:20 PM GarryDenke has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by GarryDenke, posted 06-09-2004 5:04 PM Yaro has not replied

GarryDenke 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 16
From: Drums, PA
Joined: 10-15-2003


Message 5 of 27 (61032)
10-15-2003 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by roxrkool
10-15-2003 12:52 PM


Stonehenge SUMMER SOLSTICE 2004
roxrcool -
Interesting post, Garry (presenting something I haven't seen before), but I'm confused - is this a response to another post?
John -
It is interesting, but I am a bit confused as well as to what you are presenting. You start with shark teeth, so I tought you were implying that the builders were shark worshippers. Then you present what looks like human teeth, which matcht the Stonehenge stone pattern. Then it starts to look as if you are talking about fossils found in the stone blocks used in ST's construction.
- Yes.
- Stonehenge had different phases. See above, and...
http://EvC Forum: First Stones of Stonehenge -->EvC Forum: First Stones of Stonehenge
Following are some names of the many Stonehenge investigators who failed to published the presence of Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit and Carboniferous Black Coal at the Stonehenge monument. The geologic outcrop at Stonehenge is Cretaceous White Chalk, just in case you forgot. Reason for their failure? None of these Stonehenge investigators knew about them. So the point is, why not go see for yourself what they missed, at the Stonehenge SUMMER SOLSTICE 2004 (now that you know their exact locations, and rough amounts)
http://homepages.enterprise.net/sisman/PHOTOs/StoneH1.jpg
Aiding in the celebration, so that all may see such missed Stonehenge rocks at night, is English Heritage, who has generously granted the Public free parking and free admission beginning 2200 hours (10:00 p.m.) Sunday 20th June on Father's Day night. So go if you can, it is definitely an extended weekend event. Join the midnight party round the 32.5 tons of Black Coal circling big roundtop mound along A-344 [100 metres (109 yards, 328 feet) E-SE of 04:58 Sunrise Heelstone]. The Black Coal in that Pale Grit covered trench is right under your two (2') feet.
Origin DNS error | accessibility.english-heritage.org.uk | Cloudflare
REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923
William Hawley
(1851-1941)
Antiquaries Journal. J., 5
1925
21-50
(No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein)
STONEHENGE
R.J.C. Atkinson
(1920-1994)
PENGUIN BOOKS
in association with Hamish Hamilton
1956
ISBN 0140136460
(No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein)
STONEHENGE in its landscape - twentieth-century excavations
Rosamund M J Cleal, K E Walker, and R Montague
with major contributions by
Michael J Allen, Alex Bayliss, C Bronk Ramsey, Linda Coleman,
Julie Gardiner, P A Harding, Rupert Housley, Andrew J Lawson,
Gerry McCormac, Jacqueline I McKinley, Andrew Payne,
Robert G Scaife, Dale Serjeantson, and Geoff Wainwright
ENGLISH HERITAGE
1995
ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10
ISBN 1850746052
(No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein)
PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92
Science and Stonehenge

Edited by
BARRY CUNLIFFE & COLIN RENFREW
Published for THE BRITISH ACADEMY
by OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
1997
ISBN 0197261744
(No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein)
HENGEWORLD
Mike Pitts
C
CENTURY . LONDON
2000
ISBN 0712679545
(No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein)
English Heritage
Welcome to the future of heritage | Wessex Archaeology
Here's three photos showing the Carboniferous White Limestone, Old Red Sandstone (Altar Stone), Carboniferous Black Coal and Carboniferous Pale Grit source area for these Stonehenge rocks.
http://www.soton.ac.uk/~imw/jpg/South-Wales-map-1300.jpg
http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/photos/GowerSWcoalfield.JPG
http://www.xkeys.freeserve.co.uk/geology/coalfield.gif
Here's an arial photo showing the ~100 tons of 1/4 Carboniferous White Limestone Counterscarp (foreground left). The other ~300 tons of 'missing' Carboniferous White Limestone Counterscarp was moved, piled, and is Stonehenge Mound (background left). Rammed in the ditch circling Carboniferous White Limestone Stonehenge Mound is the ~65 tons of Carboniferous Black Coal and Carboniferous Pale Grit from the South Wales Coalfield area. Old Red Sandstone (Altar Stone) is in the ~middle of Stonehenge.
http://www.orionbeadling.net/CSCARPelev.jpg
Here's a photo of the Carboniferous White Limestone Mound from the opposite direction, and a photo of the now-famous Lion head, Calf head, Man face (clockwise), and Eagle wings (centering) Heelstone Sculpture from the archway (its intended view). Rammed in the ditch circling the Tertiary Sandstone Heelstone is ~19 tons of Carboniferous White Limestone from the South Wales Coalfield area. Atkinson was right about this immediate backfilled ditch, unfortunately he failed to inspect the elder limestone fossils.
http://homepages.enterprise.net/sisman/PHOTOs/StoneH1.jpg
Just a moment...
Here's a photo of Carboniferous Black (bituminous) Coal and a photo of Cretaceous White Chalk. The geologic outcrop at Stonehenge is Cretaceous White Chalk. If you can see the color difference between the rock in the first photo and the rock in the second photo, congratulations are in order. You are smarter than the Stonehenge 'experts' (see above).
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~cbentley/virtual_samples/coal.JPG
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~cbentley/virtual_samples/chalk.JPG
Totaling ~465 tons of rocks, these ~400 tons of Carboniferous White Limestone, ~32.5 tons of Carboniferous Black Coal and ~32.5 tons of Carboniferous Pale Grit hauled to Stonehenge, from South Wales Coalfield, in the Stone Age, are the equivalent of ~46.5 ten ton diesel truck loads full of rocks, the equivalent of ~465 one ton pickup trucks full of rocks, the equivalent of ~18,600 fifty pound animal skins full of rocks, or the equivalent of ~37,200 twenty-five pound clay pots full of rocks.
This message has been edited by Garry Denke, 06-28-2004 11:27 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by roxrkool, posted 10-15-2003 12:52 PM roxrkool has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by RAZD, posted 06-27-2004 6:14 PM GarryDenke has replied

GarryDenke 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 16
From: Drums, PA
Joined: 10-15-2003


Message 6 of 27 (113977)
06-09-2004 5:04 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Yaro
10-15-2003 2:28 PM


Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!
Yaro -
I think stonehenge is a giant astrolabe.
Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) and Ezekiel’s 4 iron wheels are under Heelstone’s 2 flying eagle wings overhanging open ground. Heelstone’s lion head (top) is weathered-damaged, but its huge calf head (under right wing), wounded man face (under left wing), and 2 eagle wings (centering them), are still visible from the 7 stone archway. Rammed in the bottom-half of Heelstone’s 30m (100ft) circumference ditch is Carboniferous white stone (fossiliferous limestone) from South Wales. 3/4's of the ‘missing’ Counterscarp (Stonehenge’s outermost bank) is such Carboniferous white limestone, ~19 tons of it, the balance being Stonehenge Mound itself, ~281 tons. Located 100m (328ft) E-SE of Heelstone is such piled white limestone Stonehenge Mound resting on more artefacts over Cretaceous white chalk. The Mound and its artefacts are encircled by ~65 tons of Carboniferous black stone (fossiliferous coal) and Carboniferous pale grit (basically sandstone) from South Wales. Rammed in the bottom-half of its 113m (369ft) circumference ditch is such Carboniferous black coal and pale grit. Exodus’ gold table, gold altar, etc. (the balance of Exodus 37-40 ‘missing’ artefacts) are inside Stonehenge Mound. The white elders (older fossils) in such Carboniferous white limestone of 1/4 Counterscarp bank, 3/4 Stonehenge Mound - Heelstone Ditch bottom-half, differentiate these rocks from Stonehenge’s natural outcrop; Cretaceous white chalk, because it contains much younger fossils. Many of these fossils were originally quite large, easily identified before their fragmentation, caused by moving and crushing them. Stonehenge Heelstone Sculpture having 2 wings centering 4 beasts (described above), 24 white elders (identifying fossils) surrounding them in its ditch, and the 10000 x 10000 (1000s of 1000s) of white chalk fossils (younger identifiers), all located over/around Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’), total 6 wings (2 above GL, 4 below GL). Denoco Inc. (DI) 1984 geophysical surveys and English Heritage (EH) Ancient Monument Laboratory (AML) Archaeometry Branch (AB) 1994 geophysical surveys of Heelstone’s rectangular artefact anomaly show centering almost exactly plumb (directly below) the midpoint of Heelstone’s 2 wings overhanging such open ground. The rate of change of deviation from vertical of the Southwest (SW) leaning Heelstone since burial of Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) below its 2 wings has been been calculated, and is 10cm (4in) per ~2000yrs. This is assuming that the artefact was centered perfectly plumb with the midpoint of Heelstone’s 2 wings at the time of burial. If it was, then this centering vertical plane alignment of the 2 wings above GL and 4 wings below GL would, from DI's 1984 and EHAMLAB’s 1994 geophysical surveys, make the calculation of 5cm (2in) per ~1000yrs for Heelstone movement valid. If it was not, then such rate of change of deviation from vertical would be invalid, unless the survey results are simply off center themselves. In any case, Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) is not directly under Heelstone’s base, its 4 wings are under open ground directly below Heelstone’s overhanging 2 wings, offset by 10cm (4in). So the Heelstone does not have to be moved to retrieve Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) rectangular artefact, whose long axis parallels the 4 Station Stones’ rectanglular long axis located SW of it, according to the 1984 and 1994 geophysical surveys. Watch the magnetic reversal (polar flip) on excavation day, at exhumation hour, of the Stonehenge Heelstone artefact. Remember to shut down your computer(s) on such day, magnetic reversals damage electronics, even surge protectors, and planes, automobiles, satellites, etc.
Graviton's everywhere...
E=(hc^5/G)^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = [(6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s)
(2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)]^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
E=c^5/Gv
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/
(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(7.4008894 x 10^42 /s)
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
E=hc^3/Gm
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s)
(2.6944002 x 10^25 m^3/s^3)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)
(5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg)
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
E=h(Gd)^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s)
[(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(8.2089591 x 10^95 kg/m^3)]^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
G=c^3/mv
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (2.6944002 x 10^25 m^3/s^3)/
(5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg)(7.4008894 x 10^42 /s)
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
G =wc^4/E
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (4.0507625 x 10^-35 m)
(8.0776087 x 10^33 m^4/s^4)/(4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2)
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
G=c^4/F
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (8.0776087 x 10^33 m^4/s^4)/
(1.2106066 x 10^44 kg-m/s^2)
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
G=c^5/P
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/
(3.6293075 x 10^52 kg-m^2/s^3)
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
etc. (shortened to conserve bandwidth)
No webpage found at provided URL: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants
(1998 values shown, 2002 working on)
Because it was recorded by the geophysical surveys, and it is known from literature, Exodus’ 114cm,45in x 69cm,27in x 69cm,27in four-winged gold ark (Rev's 'throne') and Ezekiel's four iron (ferromagnetic) wheels are currently located under the Stonehenge builders' rejected Heelstone, centered below the four beasts above it, surrounded by the 24 four elder(s) species of fossils (Carboniferous) around it, and the millions of species of younger fossils (Cretaceous) below it. Furthermore, 100m (328ft) east-southeast (E-SE) of Heelstone, at Stonehenge Mound, it was recorded by the geophysical surveys, and it is known from literature, Exodus' 229cm,90in x 229cm,90in x 137cm,54in brasen altar containing Exodus' 37-40 balance of artefacts (gold table, gold altar, etc.) are currently located inside Stonehenge Mound (Carboniferous), centered below its apex, surrounded by the ~32.5 tons of bituminous coal species of fossils (Carboniferous) around it, and the millions of species of younger fossils (Cretaceous) below it.
It is true magnetic reversals are ongoing processes, however the quoted theory, one of many, is slightly flawed. All such theories will be tested by the EHAML-WANT (English Heritage, Ancient Monuments Laboratory - Wessex Archaeology, National Trust) 1) Gold Ark Experiment, to be conducted shortly. The EHAML-WANT 1) Gold Ark [with balance 1) brasen altar, 2) gold table, 3) gold altar] Experiment will trigger the next polar flip, such flip lasting less than 1hr,60min in time, beginning with decreasing candelas 36hr,2160min before exhumation, and ending with increasing candelas 36hr,2160min after exhumation, of EHAML-WANT 1) Gold Ark, throughout the universe of many. This is a true wildcat prospect Just a moment... but the exploration geophysics is completed and it is time to commence 'mining' operations. Garry W. Denke, Geologist/Geophysicist, Denoco Inc. of Texas, Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488, Plano, Texas 75086-6488 USA (972) 422-8268 Office, (972) 423-6337 Fax, (940) 521-1667 Mobile
Graviton triggers the polar flip. Watch (time).
This message has been edited by Garry Denke, 06-09-2004 04:14 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Yaro, posted 10-15-2003 2:28 PM Yaro has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by jar, posted 06-09-2004 5:14 PM GarryDenke has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 7 of 27 (113978)
06-09-2004 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by GarryDenke
06-09-2004 5:04 PM


Re: Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!
I just gotta ask, Gary. Since there has never been a magnetic reversal during the period of time electronics have been around (or civilization or even Stonhenge), just what are you basing any of your theories on? And what the heck are you talking about anyway?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by GarryDenke, posted 06-09-2004 5:04 PM GarryDenke has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by GarryDenke, posted 06-09-2004 5:40 PM jar has not replied

GarryDenke 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 16
From: Drums, PA
Joined: 10-15-2003


Message 8 of 27 (113985)
06-09-2004 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by jar
06-09-2004 5:14 PM


Re: Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!
jar -
I just gotta ask, Gary. Since there has never been a magnetic reversal during the period of time electronics have been around (or civilization or even Stonhenge), just what are you basing any of your theories on? And what the heck are you talking about anyway?
My three (3) 'ism' religions:
1) Geomagnetism
2) Uniformitarianism
3) Paleomagnetism
Updating the 2002 adjustment to 'current' time
See: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html
See: http://EvC Forum: First Stones of Stonehenge -->EvC Forum: First Stones of Stonehenge
Garry
The Seven Graviton Values 1998
1) mass... (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563026(39) x 10^-8 kg
2) length... (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(38) x 10^-35 m
3) time... (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(41) x 10^-43 s
4) current... e/(hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.1857530(90) x 10^24 A
5) temperature... (hc^5/G)^1/2/k = 3.5518626(82) x 10^32 K
6) substance... M/(hc/G)^1/2 = 1.6605387(31) x 10^-27 kmol
7) intensity... (hG/c^5)^1/2/sr = 1.9720204(06) x 10^-45 cd
The Two Graviton Angles 1998
1) solid angle... steradiant = 6.8517999(97) x 10^1 sr
2) plane angle... radiant = 1.3703599(97) x 10^2 rad
The Universe of Graviton 1998
001) irradiance constant i. = 4.5211591(52) x 10-122 s^3/kg
002) radiance constant i.= 3.0978078(26) x 10-120 s^3-sr/kg
003) radiant volume constant = 1.3554094(15) x 10^-113 m-s^2/kg
004) measurement volume = 6.6467654(65) x 10^-104 m^3
005) graviton volume constant = 1.2181812(31) x 10^-96 m^3/kg
006) luminous efficacy = 3.7229937(53) x 10^-96 cd-sr-s^3/kg-m^2
007) electric current volume = 1.3838190(49) x 10^-93 m^2/A
008) luminous energy = 1.8257115(55) x 10^-86 cd-sr-s
009) electric charge volume = 4.1485851(42) x 10^-85 m^3/A-s
010) molar volume = 4.0027765(33) x 10^-77 m^3/kmol
011) moment of inertia = 8.9530708(38) x 10^-77 kg-m^2
012) graviton fluidity = 1.0031235(26) x 10^-70 m-s/kg
013) measurement area = 1.6408677(14) x 10^-69 m^2
014) electric moment = 6.4900363(91) x 10^-54 A-s-m
015) graviton capacitance = 5.234567901... x 10^-48 A^2-s^4/kg-m^2
016) magnetic moment = 1.9456639(62) x 10^-45 A-m^2
017) luminous intensity = 1.9720204(06) x 10^-45 cd
018) graviton frequency i. = 1.3511889(41) x 10^-43 s
019) luminous flux = 1.3511889(41) x 10^-43 cd-sr
020) graviton moment = 2.2102186(33) x 10^-42 kg-m
021) inductance constant = 3.4877980(18) x 10^-39 kg-m^2/A^2-s^2
022) absorption-emission = 2.4763819(58) x 10^-36 s/kg
023) graviton wavelength = 4.0507625(38) x 10^-35 m
024) Planck constant = 6.6260687(65) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s
025) relative expansion = 2.8154241(58) x 10^-33 /K
026) electric resistivity = 1.0456155(41) x 10^-30 kg-m^3/A^2-s^3
027) unified substance = 1.6605387(31) x 10^-27 kmol
028) kinematic viscosity = 1.2143880(58) x 10^-26 m^2/s
029) inverse electric current = 8.4334589(42) x 10^-25 /A
030) Boltzmann constant= 1.3806502(93) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K
031) thermal resistance = 9.7866124(96) x 10^-21 s^3-K/kg-m^2
032) graviton molality = 3.0433405(93) x 10^-20 kmol/kg
033) elementary charge = 1.6021764(62) x 10^-19 A-s
034) primary radiation = 5.9552136(16) x 10^-17 kg-m^4/s^3
035) specific heat = 2.5303770(42) x 10^-16 m^2/s^2-K
036) magnetic flux q. = 2.0678336(42) x 10^-15 kg-m^2-sr/A-s^2-rad
037) magnetic flux = 4.1356672(77) x 10^-15 kg-m^2/A-s^2
038) electric permittivity = 1.2922425(96) x 10^-13 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3
039) magnetic exposure = 2.9363775(58) x 10^-12 A-s/kg
040) electric constant = 8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4-sr/kg-m^3
041) magnetic pole strength = 4.8032041(96) x 10^-11 A-m
042) Newton constant = 6.6723641(43) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
043) density of states = 2.0392015(07) x 10^-10 s^2/kg-m^2
044) S-B primary constant = 1.3897143(30) x 10^-9 kg/s^3-K^4
045) radiant distribution constant = 3.335640952... x 10^-9 s/m
046) graviton mass constant = 5.4563026(39) x 10^-8 kg
047) molar Planck constant = 3.9903126(87) x 10^-7 kg-m^2/s-kmol
048) magnetic constant = 1.256637061... x 10^-6 kg-m/A^2-s^2-sr
049) electric conductance = 3.8740458(43) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3/kg-m^2
050) conductance q. = 7.7480916(72) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3-rad/kg-m^2-sr
051) magnetic permeability = 8.6102258(15) x 10^-5 kg-m/A^2-s^2
052) fine-structure constant = 7.2973525(36) x 10^-3 /rad
053) second radiation constant = 1.4387752(29) x 10^-2 m-K
054) dielectric constant = 1.4594705(05) x 10^-2 /sr
055) gravitational momentum = 1.6357583(80) x 10^1 kg-m/s
056) relative permeability = 6.8517999(97) x 10^1 sr
057) inverse fine-structure = 1.3703599(97) x 10^2 rad
058) impedance of vacuum = 3.767303134 x 10^2 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3-sr
059) molar gas constant = 8.3144720(88) x 10^3 kg-m^2/s^2-kmol-K
060) spin angle constant = 9.3894326(23) x 10^3 sr-rad
061) i. conductance q. = 1.2906403(83) x 10^4 kg-m^2-sr/A^2-s^3-rad
062) von Klitzing constant = 2.5812807(61) x 10^4 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3
063) inverse gravitational mass = 1.8327429(14) x 10^7 /kg
064) Faraday constant = 9.6485341(30) x 10^7 A-s/kmol
065) speed of light in vacuum = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s
066) graviton energy constant = 4.9038802(52) x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
067) Josephson primary = 2.4179894(88) x 10^14 A-s^2/kg-m^2
068) Josephson q. = 4.8359789(67) x 10^14 A-s^2-rad/kg-m^2-sr
069) electric displacement = 3.9552465(66) x 10^15 A-s/m
070) absorbed dose = 8.987551787 x 10^16 m^2/s^2
071) luminous density = 2.7467669(26) x 10^17 cd-sr-s/m^3
072) gravity displacement = 4.4930470(15) x 10^18 kg-s/m^2
073) molar mass constant = 3.2858629(17) x 10^19 kg/kmol
074) magnetic potential = 1.0209601(87) x 10^20 kg-m/A-s^2
075) thermal conductance = 1.0218040(21) x 10^20 kg-m^2/s^3-K
076) electric current constant = 1.1857530(90) x 10^24 A
077) luminance constant = 1.2018155(94) x 10^24 cd/m^2
078) luminous flux density = 8.2346000(82) x 10^25 cd-sr/m^2
079) Avogadro constant = 6.0221419(79) x 10^26 /kmol
080) gravitational field = 1.3469816(08) x 10^27 kg/m
081) electric potential = 3.0607616(38) x 10^28 kg-m^2/A-s^3
082) electric conductivity = 9.5637446(19) x 10^29 A^2-s^3/kg-m^3
083) Celcius temperature = 3.5518626(82) x 10^32 K
084) graviton wave number = 2.4686709(99) x 10^34 /m
085) mass flow rate constant = 4.0381492(72) x 10^35 kg/s
086) molar energy = 2.9531863(13) x 10^36 kg-m^2/s^2-kmol
087) surface concentration = 1.0119881(80) x 10^42 kmol/m^2
088) graviton frequency = 7.4008894(66) x 10^42 /s
089) superforce constant = 1.2106066(96) x 10^44 kg-m/s^2
090) luminous intensity i. = 5.0709414(41) x 10^44 /cd
091) angular velocity = 1.0141882(87) x 10^45 rad/s
092) electric flux density = 9.7642024(91) x 10^49 A-s/m^2
093) radiant intensity = 5.2968673(52) x 10^50 kg-m^2/s^3-sr
094) graviton field strength = 2.2187308(44) x 10^51 m/s^2
095) superpower constant = 3.6293075(70) x 10^52 kg-m^2/s^3
096) magnetic flux density = 2.5204148(03) x 10^54 kg/A-s^2
097) thermal conductivity = 2.5224979(53) x 10^54 kg-m/s^3-K
098) magnetic field strength = 2.9272342(65) x 10^58 A/m
099) absorbed dose rate = 6.6515877(33) x 10^59 m^2/s^3
100) graviton surface density = 3.3252544(33) x 10^61 kg/m^2
101) electric field strength = 7.5560134(90) x 10^62 kg-m/A-s^3
102) measurement area i. = 6.0943364(99) x 10^68 /m^2
103) dynamic viscosity = 9.9688619(97) x 10^69 kg/m-s
104) molar concentration = 2.4982658(70) x 10^76 kmol/m^3
105) surface tension constant= 2.9885896(41) x 10^78 kg/s^2
106) electric charge density = 2.4104603(51) x 10^84 A-s/m^3
107) angular acceleration = 7.5058954(07) x 10^87 rad/s^2
108) thermal transfer = 6.2272175(40) x 10^88 kg/s^3-K
109) electric current density = 7.2263783(36) x 10^92 A/m^2
110) luminous efficacy i. = 2.6860104(16) x 10^95 kg-m^2/cd-sr-s^3
111) graviton density constant = 8.2089591(81) x 10^95 kg/m^3
112) measurement density = 1.5044911(77) x 10^103 /m^3
113) radiant density constant = 7.3778445(74) x 10^112 kg/m-s^2
114) radiance constant = 3.2280892(03) x 10^119 kg/s^3-sr
115) irradiance constant = 2.2118221(59) x 10^121 kg/s^3
etc. 9^9 (387,420,489) combinations/equations
(shortened to conserve bandwidth)
i. is inverse, q. is quantum
This message has been edited by Garry Denke, 06-09-2004 04:49 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by jar, posted 06-09-2004 5:14 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by roxrkool, posted 06-10-2004 1:26 AM GarryDenke has replied
 Message 11 by coffee_addict, posted 06-26-2004 4:59 AM GarryDenke has replied

roxrkool
Member (Idle past 988 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 9 of 27 (114062)
06-10-2004 1:26 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by GarryDenke
06-09-2004 5:40 PM


Re: Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!
too......many.............numbers..............................
brain..........................shutting..............................down.............................................
...
..
.
*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by GarryDenke, posted 06-09-2004 5:40 PM GarryDenke has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by GarryDenke, posted 06-26-2004 4:50 AM roxrkool has not replied

GarryDenke 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 16
From: Drums, PA
Joined: 10-15-2003


Message 10 of 27 (118963)
06-26-2004 4:50 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by roxrkool
06-10-2004 1:26 AM


Re: Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!
superforce = c^4/G
c = superpower/superforce
superpower = c^5/G
No webpage found at provided URL: http://perso.club-internet.fr/molaire1/e_superforce.html
We were there gathered and hoping to show you all of the Carboniferous rocks, circling/over the artifacts. No worries though, all of the Welsh born Stonehenge rocks are to be moved back to Wales:
BBC NEWS | UK | Wales | Archdruid wants Stonehenge back
Instead we visited the good Doctor Robyn Lewis who staked the official claim on behalf of all fellow druids, all bards and all the Welsh compatriots. Archdruid of Wales made no claim to our artifacts:
Whoops! Page Not Found | Discovery
Discoveries sparked it. Glacial transport disproven. So much for the Judd, Kellaway, Hawkins, Williams-Thorpe, et al, glacial transport. Thomas, Atkinson, Greene, Scourse, et al, would be proud.
Page Not Found - Oxford University Press
Here is the good Doctor's requested list of Welsh rocks that need to go back to Wales. They are in the way of the excavation of our gold, silver, brass, iron, wood, and stone artifacts anyway. Archdruid of Wales, the good Doctor Robyn Lewis, has offered to pay for their removal, as agreed, making this a low cost excavation:
Microsoft OneDrive - Access files anywhere. Create docs with free Office Online.
1) Stonehenge Whitestones - The oldest limestone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period, Arundian Age, calcium carbonates. The Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period limestone sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 340 million years old. These stones are called High Tor (Birnbeck) Limestone Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.
2) Stonehenge Bluestones - The volcanic rocks (oldest geologically) at Stonehenge are the Ordovician Period intrusive igneous diabases (dolerites), and extrusive igneous felsites (rhyolites) and tuffs (basic). The Ordovician Period igneous rocks comprise the second (2nd) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 470 million years old. These stones are called Ordovician Volcanic rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.
3) Stonehenge Coshestons - The oldest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Silurian-Devonian Period micaceous sandstones. The Silurian-Devonian Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the third (3rd) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 417 million years old. These stones are called Old Red Sandstone Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.
4) Stonehenge Gritstones - The sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), Namurian Age, silicates, calcium carbonates, and carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks comprise the fourth (4th) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 320 million years old. These stones are called Millstone Grit Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.
5) Stonehenge Coalstones - The bituminous coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period, Westphalian Age, carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period bituminous coal sedimentary rocks comprise the fifth (5th) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 310 million years old. These stones are called Crosskeys Coal Measures rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.
Here Here to the good Doctor, the Archdruid of Wales!
Garry Denke
ps. See that roxrkool, this excavation is financed.
This message has been edited by Garry Denke, 06-26-2004 01:04 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by roxrkool, posted 06-10-2004 1:26 AM roxrkool has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 476 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 11 of 27 (118964)
06-26-2004 4:59 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by GarryDenke
06-09-2004 5:40 PM


Re: Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!
Do you have some kind of sexual fantasy about posting such unnecessary info? You could have just explained to us (as short as possible) what the heck you're trying to show.
By the way, the sexual fantasy part was a joke.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by GarryDenke, posted 06-09-2004 5:40 PM GarryDenke has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by GarryDenke, posted 06-26-2004 2:07 PM coffee_addict has not replied

custard
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 27 (118965)
06-26-2004 5:12 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by GarryDenke
10-15-2003 12:20 PM


gary writes:
c) E-SE Stonehenge Artifact Burial mound is foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock. Source: 3/4 of the original complete circle of Counterscarp limestone first (1st) stone hedge of Stonehenge.
Two points:
1- Isn't it true if you take the reverse azimuth of the E-SE Artifact Burial mound, it is, in fact, W-NW?
2- I thought they found traces of copper sulfate and magnesium in the Birnbeck Limestone which indicated subsequent construction AFTER the initial counterscarp was erected?
G=c^3/mv
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m
I thought it was "6.6723647X 10^-11m?"
This message has been edited by custard, 06-26-2004 04:15 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GarryDenke, posted 10-15-2003 12:20 PM GarryDenke has not replied

GarryDenke 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 16
From: Drums, PA
Joined: 10-15-2003


Message 13 of 27 (119025)
06-26-2004 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by coffee_addict
06-26-2004 4:59 AM


Re: Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!
These rocks get to stay Lam, so what is the big deal?
1) Stonehenge White Chalk - The outcrop sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Cretaceous Period, Santonian Age, calcium carbonates. The Late Cretaceous Period outcrop sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) English construction material used by the Stonehenge builders of England. This material is approximately 85 million years old. These stones are called Seaford Chalk Formation rocks. They are English and belong in England.
2) Stonehenge Sarsens - The youngest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Oligocene-Miocene (Tertiary) Period silicates. The Oligocene-Miocene Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the second (2nd) English construction material used by the Stonehenge builders of England. This material is approximately 24 million years old. These stones are called Reading Formation rocks. They are English and belong in England.
Unless of course Marlborough wants the Sarsens back;
Save and Except: the Heelstone of Hampshire County.
Stonehenge Heelstone Sculpture
In 22 separate excavations, for which the detailed records are published, a total of "over 11,500 stone fragments were recorded" at Stonehenge (PROCEEDINGS AT THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92, SCIENCE AND STONEHENGE, Cunliffe & Renfrew, 1997, pages 258-9), representing all of its different lithologies. Approximately 4,000 sarsen chips, including "a total of 3,760 sarsen fragments", and "sarsen sand from the area", excavated by Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley (REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923, W. Hawley, 1925, pages 21-50), from a single location within ten (10) meters of the Heelstone, in the Avenue between the Heelstone and the Slaughter Stone, "do strongly suggest that a stone was either dressed or broken up in the vicinity" (STONEHENGE, Cleal, Walker, Montague, 1995, page 290), in front of the Heelstone carvings.
In 1975, Arizona State University (ASU) GLG 324 Petrology-Petrography class analised the Cainozoic Reading Formation sarsen samples provided by Professor Richard Atkinson from the London Basin, the Hampshire Basin, and from each of the sarsens at Stonehenge. The ASU 1975 GLG 324 Petrology-Petrography class determined through optical mineralogy and geochemical analysis that the source area of the Palaeogene-Oligocene age heavy mineralogy Heelstone was from the Hampshire Basin located to the south of Stonehenge, and all of the rest of the Neogene-Miocene age lighter mineralogy sarsens at Stonehenge were from the London Basin to the north of Stonehenge. It was from this first detailed analysis by ASU in 1975, and the subsequent works of H. Howard 1982; A petrological study of the rock specimens from excavations at Stonehenge, 1979-1980, in M.W. Pitts, 1982, 104-24, where the Heelstone carvings fragment chips from its sculpture were determined. In short, the piles of sarsen chips and sarsen sand at the sarsen Heelstone, "do strongly suggest that a stone was either dressed or broken up in the vicinity" (STONEHENGE, Cleal, Walker, Montague, 1995, page 290), in front of the Heelstone Lion head, Calf head, Man face (clockwise), and Eagle wings (centering) carvings:
Just a moment...
Bibliography:
REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923
William Hawley
Antiq. J., 5
1925
21-50
Hele Stone, sarsen chips,
and sarsen sand
STONEHENGE
R.J.C. Atkinson
PENGUIN BOOKS
in association with Hamish Hamilton
1956
ISBN 0140136460
INDEX 221
Carvings, prehistoric,
43-7, 91-3, 139-40, 178-9, 208-9
Heel Stone,
29-30,68-9, 70, 76, 105, 173, 203
STONEHENGE in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations
Rosamund M J Cleal, K E Walker, and R Montague with major contributions by
Michael J Allen, Alex Bayliss, C Bronk Ramsey, Linda Coleman, Julie Gardiner,
P A Harding, Rupert Housley, Andrew J Lawson, Gerry McCormac, Jacqueline I McKinley,
Andrew Payne, Robert G Scaife, Dale Serjeantson, and Geoff Wainwright
ENGLISH HERITAGE
1995
ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10
ISBN 1850746052
INDEX 603, 608
carvings, prehistoric
30-3, Plate 7.2
Heelstone (Stone 96),
25, 26, 166, 269, 270, 271, 272
PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92
Science and Stonehenge

Edited by
BARRY CUNLIFFE & COLIN RENFREW
Published for THE BRITISH ACADEMY
by OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
1997
ISBN 0197261744
INDEX 351, 355
carvings, prehistoric
5, 29, 35, 150, 338
Heelstone (Stone 96)
15, 16, 28, 155
HENGEWORLD
Mike Pitts
C
CENTURY . LONDON
2000
ISBN 0712679545
INDEX 402, 403
Stonehenge
carvings
8, 26, 265-6, 296-7, 27, 266
Heelstone
8, 96, 135, 139, 145-50, 154, 229, 266, 275, 7, 138, 146, 230

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by coffee_addict, posted 06-26-2004 4:59 AM coffee_addict has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1404 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 14 of 27 (119283)
06-27-2004 6:14 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by GarryDenke
10-15-2003 3:16 PM


change url please for easier reading
you have one long url in your post that makes all the paragraphs hard to read
the same information is at
Origin DNS error | accessibility.english-heritage.org.uk | Cloudflare
or you can edit the post to link the url (if you pick the "RAW TEXT" button you will see what I did):
SUMMER SOLSTICE 2004 CONDITIONS OF ENTRY AND INFORMATION
feel free to copy either and replace your original link
we also know that Stonehenge is an astrolab and predicts solar eclipses ... what evidence do you have for any link to christianity?
or am I missing something?

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by GarryDenke, posted 10-15-2003 3:16 PM GarryDenke has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by GarryDenke, posted 06-29-2004 1:37 AM RAZD has replied

pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6022 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 15 of 27 (119292)
06-27-2004 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by GarryDenke
10-15-2003 12:20 PM


Hi Garry,
Would you do us all a favor and please post a simple, brief description of your hypothesis/argument, assuming we all know little to nothing about Stonehenge history/geology?
You don't need to post any more facts/references. It would be very helpful to those trying to sift through your facts and figures...
Thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GarryDenke, posted 10-15-2003 12:20 PM GarryDenke has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by GarryDenke, posted 06-29-2004 1:46 AM pink sasquatch has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024