If milk, carrots, and drinking water tasted bad, it would be a good indicator. If one company’s milk or carrots tasted better than another company’s, company #1 would get the business and make more money. Of course I realize that one company isn’t in a position to test another company’s product, and taste isn’t always foolproof, some poison is tasteless. If testing is required, it should be up to the states to do it, each in their own way as they see fit.
This is as asinine an argument as you have ever made. You do realize that the companies selling the veggies to the public are not the companies that would be doing the polluting. The original polluters could be hundreds or thousands of miles away. Do you think there is some sort of magic barrier at state lines?
Most environmental issues aren’t about pollution crossing state lines that one state finds objectionable while another does not.
Bullshit. This is just one of your unevidenced assertions. Does reality mean anything to you. Please explain how environmental issues are stopped by statelines. Did the BP blowout just effect one state? Why do you think states banded together to combat unregulated smokestack emissions?
This isn't even dogma. You are spouting crap that can be very easily shown to be blatantly false.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts