Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   animals on the ark
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5897 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 2 of 196 (6144)
03-05-2002 4:24 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by quicksink
03-05-2002 3:50 AM


QS: You're obviously not keeping up with current creation science research. Since all life was created 6000 years ago in the Cambrian Explosion (scientists got the decimal point wrong, they meant to say six thousand, not six hundred million or so), there is only a requirement to have a total of 13 kinds on the ark. There's been no change in kinds since. After all, a chordate is still a chordate, right? The ark thus doesn't have to be any larger than a houseboat.
[Sorry, couldn't resist.]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by quicksink, posted 03-05-2002 3:50 AM quicksink has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by John, posted 06-09-2002 6:27 PM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5897 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 92 of 196 (11235)
06-10-2002 3:43 AM
Reply to: Message 91 by John
06-09-2002 6:27 PM


Yeah, John. I was kidding. I was just taking the "no variation between kinds" argument to its (il)logical conclusion. If you doubt it, see my long-winded discussion with Philip on the human evolution thread. I'm arguing against biblical essentialism - which is the heart of the "kinds" argument.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by John, posted 06-09-2002 6:27 PM John has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Randy, posted 08-18-2002 10:52 PM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5897 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 94 of 196 (15667)
08-19-2002 7:02 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Randy
08-18-2002 10:52 PM


Hi randy.
Yeah, Woodmorappe's a joke. However, in the interests of fairness, I asked my resident science advisor (Dani, age 8) to provide a reference list of critters that could have been on the ark two-by-two (except when it was seven). Once you accept the creationist hyper-"microevolution" from the ark kinds to the 11+ million species alive today (and rejecting the hollow Earth and ark-as-planetoid-sized-spaceship explanations), it's pretty easy to come up with the exact list of what could have been on the ark.
Here is Dani's list of Kreated Kinds:
Feathered Kind
Bug Kind
Plant Kind
Things-that-live-in-water Kind
Things-that-live-in-water-and-breathe-air Kind
Things-too-small-to-see Kind
Furry Animal Kind
Furry-animal-with-wings Kind (had to have bats in there somewhere)
Cold-blooded-animals-with-feet Kind
Cold-blooded-animals-without-feet Kind
Dinosaur Kind
Animals-that-live-in-water-sometimes Kind (she has a thing about frogs, for some reason)
Things-that-live-in-water-and-breathe-air-with-shells Kind (e.g., turtles)
Things-that-live-in-water-and-don't-breathe-air-with-shells Kind (e.g., clams)
People Kind
As you can see, there were in fact about 15 species on the ark. She might have missed some - after all, she's only 8. Could've been housed in something about the size of a small yacht with a couple of acquariums. I don't know why AiG and ICR haven't realized how easy it is...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Randy, posted 08-18-2002 10:52 PM Randy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Randy, posted 08-19-2002 9:09 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5897 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 100 of 196 (22319)
11-12-2002 1:18 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by galon
11-11-2002 8:35 PM


Interesting. The largest ships IIRC of the period were the Roman frumentariae or grain ships (plying the waters between Alexandria and Rome, but also used to carry legions during the Punic Wars - which is the only reason I know anything about them ). They ran about 180 feet long, fairly wide, and supposedly wallowed like pigs in even a normal sea. They were sailing vessels rather than oared, and constructed of cedar. 'Course, no one knows what "gopher wood" is, so the creationists can simply claim it had magical properties that prevented a boat constructed of it from breaking up at the first wavelet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by galon, posted 11-11-2002 8:35 PM galon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by galon, posted 11-12-2002 6:45 PM Quetzal has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5897 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 120 of 196 (305964)
04-22-2006 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by CACTUSJACKmankin
04-22-2006 2:37 PM


Hi Cactus, welcome to EvC.
You're making a lot of good posts - thanks for your input. However, as a suggestion for future reference, you just might want to check out the date stamp on the posts to which you are responding. In this case, ol' quicksink hasn't even posted once on this message board since 10 april, 2002. There's no restriction about resurrecting old threads, of course. However, you're likely to get a better response from our creo friends if you pick a more recent post.
Again, welcome to EvC.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by CACTUSJACKmankin, posted 04-22-2006 2:37 PM CACTUSJACKmankin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024