|
Author
|
Topic: The Flood = many coincidences
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
Message 6 of 445 (490780)
12-08-2008 11:53 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by bluescat48
12-08-2008 10:09 AM
|
|
There is an estimated 30,000 seamounts across the globe, but only a few have ever been studied. These are mountains under water. Heh. You've walked into one here, Peg. There is a huge long chain of seamounts to the west of Hawaii, and it gets deeper and deeper to their summits as you go further west (and north). They also look more eroded as you go that same direction. They're all extinct volcanos, just like the islands of Hawaii are (except the Big Island, which is still active). Radiometric dates on lavas from the mounts and the islands get progressively, monotonously older as you go west from the Big Island. Can you make a Fludde do all that? Modern geology can explain it all. Would you like to explain how a Fludde can, or would you like to learn what really happened?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by bluescat48, posted 12-08-2008 10:09 AM | | bluescat48 has not replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
Re: The ocean basins = huge evidence.
What is wrong with this picture? Your TV may be out of adjustment, but there's nothing wrong with the picture over here. You're just leaving subduction out of your little scenario. Ask the folks in Aceh Province, Sumatra what subduction can do.
"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons, ca. 830 AD
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
|
Message 70 of 445 (491448)
12-16-2008 8:35 AM
|
Reply to: Message 69 by Rrhain
12-16-2008 3:26 AM
|
|
Mt. Everest weighs approximately 3x10^5 kg. Surely many times that, Rrhain. A cubic kilometer of rock is going to be 3 X 10^9 kg, and Everest is bigger than just one km^3.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 69 by Rrhain, posted 12-16-2008 3:26 AM | | Rrhain has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 79 by Rrhain, posted 12-16-2008 11:57 PM | | Coragyps has not replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
Re: The ocean crust - it's a great big bust! (or not keeping abreast of reality)
You've never even looked at the rocks in the Appalachians, have you, Archie? How in hell anyone that finished eighth grade Earth Science could mistake all those folded sediments for volcanic rock is beyond me....
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
buffoonery
but has no movement.. Except for the interplate movement that's measured all over the world every day, of course. Have you ever heard of the Global Positioning System, Archie?
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
Archie, you neglected to answer me: have you never heard of the Global Positioning System? Garmin? Tom-Tom?
"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons, ca. 830 AD
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
|
Message 157 of 445 (512510)
06-18-2009 4:29 PM
|
Reply to: Message 156 by roxrkool
06-18-2009 3:13 PM
|
|
Could it be that "Vertical Tectonics" is that "expanding Earth" baloney?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 156 by roxrkool, posted 06-18-2009 3:13 PM | | roxrkool has not replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
Message 190 of 445 (542366)
01-09-2010 11:53 AM
|
Reply to: Message 189 by RAZD
01-09-2010 8:06 AM
|
|
Re: Ballistic Sedimentation - A Geological Epiphany
Heh! RAZD, don't you know that if you can tell bullets apart by ballistics, you can sort forams with ballistics, too?
"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons, ca. 830 AD
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 189 by RAZD, posted 01-09-2010 8:06 AM | | RAZD has seen this message but not replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
Re: Sea-Floor "spreading" is false - Plate Tectonics is finished
now scientists are performing Flood forensics. Which scientists? Have they published yet? And why can we measure the spreading rate on either side of a mid-ocean ridge if the sides are converging, as you imagine?
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
Re: The great flood
It is impossible that no sedimentary layers were formed over the extremely long period of 150 million years... Why is that "impossible?" All an area needs to do is stay out of the water for that long, and it can be unsedimented. Try San Saba County, Texas, or a big portion of Quebec if you need an example.
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
Cooling calcuactions is not geology. its chemistry. No shit, Robert? Really? Here I've been a professional chemist for 32 years after toomanyyears in Chemistry School, and I've been mistaken the whole time about that chemical change vs. phase change thing? Making ice cubes has been a chemical reaction all along??!
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
i need geological points as i have no interest or ability in these atomic concepts. Again, I must ask: No shit, Robert? What the fuck do you think rocks are made of? And what the fuck do you think you know about even your version of geology?
|
™ Version 4.2