Wrong you say? Which claim is wrong?? Let’s unpack, this is a science forum for goodness sake:
1. Magma chambers below AZ; This is known to be true as geophysical evidence has shown the existence of a massive chamber(s).
404
This is one of the more poorly written articles I've ever read. Besides it says there is a molten layer around the whole world...
This truly is no surprise as by carefully studying the geomorphology of AZ (and the SW in general), massive volcanism is obvious.
Just because there are volcanic rocks does not mean that the magma chamber is still there...
Do you understand what happens to magma chambers?
There are massive edifices (San Francisco Peaks, Mt. Baldy, Mt. Taylor and Valles Calderas NM) among numerous lava flows, dikes, necks, etc. There is also a massive lava field on the northern edge of the Grand Canyon.
Most of the ocean floor is lava. Do you also suppose that there is a large magma chamber everywhere beneath the ocean?
Also known to be true in this region are the existence of massive aquifers.
Maybe you could point one out to us?
Aquifers+magma chambers is the perfect combo for destructive phreato-magmatic eruptions.
Possibly. But that would also be that case with normal aquifers.
Plate tectonics has absolutely nothing to do with the existence of magma chambers.
Sure it does. Why do you think that the Arizona geography is so broken up?
3. Dino prints and remains; Also known and true. There are a plethora of prints throughout the SW especially within the reservations. Of course, they are on the top strata and the
Nonsense. The are on the 'top strata' because that is what is exposed by erosion. They occur in several layers and some of those are stratigraphically deep.
Natives will also tell you they are on mesas, in valleys, etc. Therefore Dinos were running around everywhere, and probably running from a pyroclastic flow and/or massive ash fallout.
This is plain silly. Footprints in the Dakota Formation would be on the ridges and mesa tops because it is a resistant sandstone, and those in the Morrison Formation would be in more of the valleys because of the presence of less resistant shales. In both cases, they are quite old, just exposed by erosion.
Given these facts, we can conclude that there is strong evidence that Dino AND this ancient civilization were buried by a massive eruption(s).
Nonsense. The dinosaur footprints are often buried by other sediments of the same formation and the Anasazi civilization is not buried by anything. If they ran away from a volcanic eruption, they were wasting their time.
Keep in mind, the Spanish did not arrive until the 1500’s and the tribes they met were most likely remnant and scattered tribes from a ‘extinction’ that could have taken place only a few thousand years earlier. In addition, there is also compounding evidence in other parts of the world that Dino and man lived at the same time showing up in ancient architectural artifacts. You can do the research this subject on your own.
And that research shows that the artwork is a hoax or else has nothing to do with dinosaurs.
Of course, this massive evidence obliterates the 65 million year old Dino demise.
Except that you have provided no evidence.
The Jurassic world is nothing but a science fiction scenario that has rooted itself as fact.
Except that is is documented, whereas your fantastic world is not shown anywhere in the geologic record.
Just like the plate tectonic sea floor spreading and subduction diagrams, scientists are truly duped by their own cartoon drawings of the Jurassic world.
Except that we can actually see it happening. Kinda blows away your theory, doesn't it?
Duped by the diagrams; this scientific affliction continues.
Yep, them scientists is pretty stoopid, ain't they?
A good read; Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact by Native American Vine Deloria. He is not a Creationist nor an Evolutionists, yet he challenges the entire scientific community regarding many aspects of geology and archeology.
Hey, there are all kinds of crackpots in the world. Do you ever read any mainstream articles or texts?
He also scoffs at plate tectonics and orthodox geology and rightfully so as they are truly obsolete.
Hey, if whatshisname say it, I'm convinced! Umm, the only problem is that we can see PT actually happening. How do you handle that?
In light of my own research into the ancient Native American architectural artifacts, I will say that they are grossly misunderstood, and their achievements in what I will call sustainable development, is impressive to say the least.
Evidently, it didn't sustain them very well...
I agree that they are misunderstood by some people.
Now, am I supposed to take your post seriously?
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Fix some quote boxes.
™ Version 4.2
(1)