But yet, science laws teach only scientific opinions in school.
So gravitation is just an opinion?
I personally see no real difference in forcing people to teach only science.
There is a reason it is called science class. Which creation fable should be taught? Do we allow them to teach that leprechauns are a fact?
And wouldn't free speech also apply to creationists as well? Why should science be taught in schools under the guise of free speech when creationism is not taught in schools under free speech.
Because it ISN'T SCIENCE? The courts have determined that very clearly.
They've always been used as strawmen
Do you understand what a strawman is?
and it should be left up to the real experts to determine if they truly decide to include creationism in schools.
Who? Preachers? Religious fundies? Since in 1865 the majority of people in the south still supported slavery, the US should have allowed it to continue? You do realize the lots of states did not support the civil rights acts, should we allow states to decide not o have to follow civil rights laws?
But yes, the Supreme Court does agree that anti-evolution laws do infringe upon free speech rights.
So you feel the Supreme Court decisions are not the law of the land?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts