An honest and thorough nearly three decade study of it's fulfilled prophesies ...
Or, perhaps, a naive but dogmatic effort to rationalize reverse engineering as prophesy.
Yah, there are minor infractions here and there due to things like human error in keeping exactly what was written origionally exact, ...
And how, precisely, did you alone come into possession of the
Urtext? In fact, you haven't a clue as to what was
"what was written origionally exact", and would no doubt rationalize it if you did (e.g., Deuteronomy 32:8).
..., but these are insignicant in light of the overwhelming evidence for it's credibility.
The only thing overwhelming here is the pretention. To speak of
overwhelming evidence for Adam & Eve, Sons of God (presumable unbegotten, if one is to believe John), the Flood, the Exodus, the Virgin Birth, the silly fish story, the resurrection, and the subsequent resurrection and stroll through Jerusalem of a bunch of dead saints is either delusional or disengenuous.
™ Version 4.2
