Luke and Matthews geneologies

Well I looked at the link and it semeed to be just making excuses to pretend that Luke didn't mean what he wrote.It's pretty obvious that where it says that Jesus was supposedly the son of Joseph that it *doesn't* mean that the man named as Joseph's father is really Mary's. How anyone could honestly make such a claim is beyond me.All it proves to me is that they are quite happy to twist the Bible when it clashes with their beliefs.

Well IF you are prepared to accept that the Book of Mormon is a genuien ancient document then you would have no problems finding fulfilled prophecies in it.I have to say, however, that although it is often claimed that there is an impressive record of fulfilled prophecies in the Bible nobody seems to be able to find much. Often they have to pass off failures as successes or poetry as prophecy. If the Bible is so full of fulfilled prophecies then why would they do that ?