slevesque writes:
I say it is clear because a creationist will see the specificity in the design of form and function, while the evolutionists will see that the bones have analog counterparts in terrestial mammals that will hint at common descent.
Perhaps that would be your line of reasoning. Aaron seems to argue that there are flaws in the evolution based reasoning that evolutionists should appreciate. Maybe he's right.
This is clearly not the case for the vast majority of claimed vestigial features
Evidence please.
You seem to say clearly quite often.