So Just How is ID's Supernatural-based Science Supposed to Work? (SUM. MESSAGES ONLY)

Of course there is evidence that Dark Matter exists, In fact it was the evidence that there was more matter in the universe than could be accounted for by the visible matter that began the study.And that is precisely the difference.If there was evidence that anything like "that God or superior consciousness or supernatural" existed comparable to the evidence that began the search for Dark Matter then there might be something to investigate.So is there anything comparable to the evidence that exists for Dark Matter or God or superior consciousness or supernatural?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

I'm sorry but that is simply a totally false post, filled with errors and a lack of reasoning or understanding.There was evidence, the gravitational attraction was there. There was evidence, lots of evidence, confirmed by observation after observation, that there was more mass out there than could be seen. The evidence was there. There had to be something other than just the visible matter we could see.It was not the absence of evidence that started the investigation but rather lots of evidence.So is there anything comparable to the evidence that exists for Dark Matter or God or superior consciousness or supernatural?Edited by jar, : fix subtitleEdited by jar, : appalin spallin

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Is there any evidence there even is anything supernatural?If there is no evidence something even exists then there is nothing to investigate.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

then it should be easy to provide links to the posts where that is covered.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

What is even funnier is his assertion that "consciousness is outside of the realm of today’s science" yet if you go to Google Scholar and enter "consciousness" you get "Results 1 - 10 of about 1,950,000. (0.08 sec)"One million nine hundred fifty thousand returns hardly looks like science knows that "consciousness" is outside the realm of today's science.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Sorry but what is a supernatural phenomenon?Is there any evidence such a thing exists?Is there any evidence that there is some God or that that God communicates with anyone?I think such a proposal would and should simply be met with laughter.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

I would be happy to if there was some evidence such a thing existed so I could try to describe it.Did you not post: Note the underlined words.You are making an assertion that supernatural phenomenon exist and that God communicates.They are YOUR assertions.I am simply asking for evidence at least comparable to what has been seen for Dark Matter that such critters even exist.Unless there is some evidence something exists, how can one research it?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Once again you simply post total falsehoods and misrepresentation, which is what we have learned to expect from you.Many of the recognized Christian Churches understand that Evolution is a fact and that the Theory of Evolution is the only model that explains the variety of life seen today and in the past and to imply that it is some atheistic position is simply false and this has been pointed out to you many times.In the words of the Clergy letter signed by over 12,000 US Clergy:

quote:

---

We the undersigned, Christian clergy from many different traditions, believe that the timeless truths of the Bible and the discoveries of modern science may comfortably coexist. We believe that the theory of evolution is a foundational scientific truth, one that has stood up to rigorous scrutiny and upon which much of human knowledge and achievement rests. To reject this truth or to treat it as one theory among others is to deliberately embrace scientific *** and transmit such *** to our children. We believe that among God’s good gifts are human minds capable of critical thought and that the failure to fully employ this gift is a rejection of the will of our Creator. To argue that God’s loving plan of salvation for humanity precludes the full employment of the God-given faculty of reason is to attempt to limit God, an act of hubris. We urge school board members to preserve the integrity of the science curriculum by affirming the teaching of the theory of evolution as a core component of human knowledge. We ask that science remain science and that religion remain religion, two very different, but complementary, forms of truth.

---

Edited by jar, : appalin spallin

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!