So, you started a thread questioning if natural selection worked, and when evidence was provided that it did you tried to broaden the subject, instead of starting a new topic. (Random mutations are not and never have been a part of natural selection.).
Then you tried posting a thread on a very broad topic, against forum policy and the moderators actually followed forum policy instead of doing what you wanted !
And then you were allowed to start a thread asserting that all the evidence for evolution was found in bacteria and thus evolution should be characterised as explaining everything in terms of changing bacterial diets. And so you got subjected to evidence contrary to your assertion ! You are actually literally complaining that it is wrong to allow people to post factual evidence against your claims !
And then you object to a perfectly fair comment from Admin simply giving a personal opinion on the disagreement.
I think we can conclude that your problem is not that moderation is biased. Your problem is that it is NOT grossly biased in your favour.