Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are Atheists "Philosophically Limited"....?
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4170 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 15 of 262 (618621)
06-04-2011 11:11 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by GDR
06-04-2011 2:45 AM


Re: Are Atheists "Philosophically Limited"....?
GDR writes:
To get back to the OP I would have to think that atheists are philosophically limited. Presumably, and correct me if I'm wrong, an atheist would be by definition a materialist. If that is the case then they would have no use for philosophy and would thus be limited in that department.
Positivism
Materialism
Physicalism
Physical ontology
Naturalistic pantheism
Empiricism
Sociological naturalism
I think all of the above could be considered by an Atheist, there are probably more, but here are ones I found that seem to fit the bill.

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by GDR, posted 06-04-2011 2:45 AM GDR has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4170 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


(1)
Message 149 of 262 (620668)
06-19-2011 4:40 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Phat
06-19-2011 4:00 PM


Re: How Atheists Saved Philosophy
Phat writes:
I would argue that we are giving ourselves too much credit.
Hi Phat,
I think the opposite, look at all the wondrous things man has accomplished, yet there are those out there that want to give credit to aliens, god...ect. Is it so hard to imagine we built the pyramids, went from the Wright brothers first flight to the moon in less than 67 years, without help?
Humans did all that and so much more on our own, some may have been inspired by the thoughts of god, Sistine chapel for example, but I see no difference between inspiration from god and inspiration from nature. We humans can be inspired by so many things, including but not limited to god.
To think that god is responsible for all the wondrous things we have done is selling us, and him short. If you believe in god, wouldn't you think he would have gave us the ability to think and create on our own? Would this not be limiting yourself philosophically to think he is the only reason we are so great in many ways? I would rather think he would be proud of all the good things we have done, and saddened by all the bad.
Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.
Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.
Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Phat, posted 06-19-2011 4:00 PM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024