|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: So Just How is ID's Supernatural-based Science Supposed to Work? (SUM. MESSAGES ONLY) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes: So you think it is not you: it is everyone else? No? Sorry if I seem a little disgruntled. I have been arguing the definition of supernatural for two days and I am now convinced no one here understands English. I continue to feel that my decision to stop discussing supernatural phenomena with you has been thoroughly validated.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Do you think that these 2 sentences contradict each other?
My parrot is blue.My parrot is not blue.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes:
Wrong! That depends on the reader. My parrot is blue: depressed My parrot is not blue: [My parrot] is not the color blue. Don't you know what the meaning of blue is? Am I the only one that can speak English here? My parrot IS the colour blue!!My parrot IS NOT depressed!! Can't you understand English!!?!??! /caricature off .......and that is what your posts have been like.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes:
Stop laughing and learn to read and comprehend. LMAO Your cute when your angry.I was not angry - I was copying your arguments. I guess it was all too much for you to understand.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes:
Answer this question correctly and I will accept your tuition: Ok then fine. Let’s have an English lesson on the true meaning of this word supernatural one last time. My parrot is blue.My parrot is not blue. Is my parrot blue? (You got it wrong last time. Maybe this time you will get it right.) Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes:
Ok then fine. Let’s have an English lesson on the true meaning[sic] of this word 'blue' one last time. I thank you for your concession, but let us not cease discussion if any healthy thing could be learned or discovered through continuation of discussion. blue /blo͞o/Noun, adjective: The primary color between green and violet in the visible spectrum, an effect of light with a wavelength between 450 and 500 nm. Adjective: low in spirits parrot /ˈparət/Noun: A mainly tropical bird (family Psittacidae), often vividly colored, with a short down-curved hooked bill and a raucous voice, some kinds of which are able to mimic the human voice. Should I define the word 'my'? maybe 'is' too? Answer the question...My parrot is blue. My parrot is not blue. Is my parrot blue? Please note (since you seem immune to anything even slightly subtle) this is how your posts are presented.If you can't answer the question, then how are we meant to answer your questions?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes:
Yay. "A falsifiable idea, on the other hand, is one for which there is a conceivable test that might produce evidence proving the idea false."Now we get to watch you jump between definitions of 'Proof'. The parrot is blue and the parrot is not blue. Is the parrot blue?You have still never answered this correctly. Can you not understand English?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes:
If consciousness is outside of the realm of today's science, what are you going to use to research consciousness?
There is enough belief that consciousness is outside of the realm of today’s science to validate research into the subject.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes:
How are you going to look or test for any of those things? If consciousness is outside of the realm of today's science, what are you going to use to research consciousness?
Build on what science does know about brain function and communication. How is information sent and received in the brain? What is the role of electricity in the brain? What frequency is that electricity? Do the electrical impulses carry data like computers transfer data, or in some other way? How does the brain come up with ideas? Are idea’s chemically, or electrically generated? What area of the brain interprets data that has been stored? Could brain waves interpret data from an outside source besides its own brain tissue? Etc. etc. Can you give an actual example of how you might research consciousness?Please describe the process you would use. (Remember that you can't use science as you've already shown that consciousness is beyond the realm of today's science.) Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes:
How could it do better? (Remember that you can't use science as you've already shown that consciousness is beyond the realm of today's science.)
consciousness is only beyond todays science because it does not have accelerated funding for its research. It is currently researched quite well, but it could do better.How can it be researched at all? As you asserted: consciousness is beyond the realm of today's science. If consciousness is outside of the realm of today's science, what are you going to use to research consciousness?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Ah...I see.
When someone asks you a question that points out the flaws in your logic, your response is to ignore the question. An effective but disingenuous technique. As someone from this forum previously pointed out: refusing to answer direct questions is a sign of lying.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
tesla writes:
No, you have not answered the question. Ah...I see. When someone asks you a question that points out the flaws in your logic, your response is to ignore the question. An effective but disingenuous technique. I have already answered your questions in other posts. Read my last post to scientific. If you leave me nothing to discuss, but only something to bicker, I choose to acknowledge and not bicker.Your reply to Scienctifictruths was about funding. As I asked previously: If consciousness is outside of the realm of today's science, what are you going to use to research consciousness?Can you give an actual example of how you might research consciousness? Please describe the process you would use.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
tesla writes:
Since you are explicitly avoiding answering the question by pretending to be stupid, I am left with the inescapable conclusion that you are a liar. If consciousness is outside of the realm of today's science, what are you going to use to research consciousness? Can you give an actual example of how you might research consciousness? Please describe the process you would use. I would hire the top brain experts and ask them what they needed to begin experiments to further understand how thoughts are interpreted and relayed within the brain.If you think that lying brings any support to your theories, then you are sadly mistaken. I now acknowledge that you are clearly indicating that your arguments are false and that you are unable to back them up with either evidence or logic.I accept your capitulation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
He has been asked many, many times to explain the 'how' of his research.
I have asked him and now you are asking him. We have both asked several times. (He even tried answering the question "How do you do research?" with "I ask a scientist to do research".) For him to have still not done so must surely be because of either deceit or dementia. Edited by Panda, : No reason given. Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024