Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Dates and Dating ⇒

What's the creationists thought on this?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What's the creationists thought on this?
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8546
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 97 of 136 (619973)
06-13-2011 3:28 PM 		Reply to: Message 95 by Mazzy
06-13-2011 3:03 PM

Carbon Dating Rocks
'd just like to bring this research to your attention in response to your assertion that carbon dating is accurate.
​
I hope you're not suggesting that radiocarbon dating is applied to non-organic, very old rocks. That would show a complete ignorance of the subject.
​
Do you know where, why and how radiocarbon dating is used and its level of accuracy when appropriately applied?
​
[abe] Disregard. Coyote beat me to it.
​
Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Mazzy, posted 06-13-2011 3:03 PM Mazzy has not replied
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8546
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 120 of 136 (620362)
06-15-2011 7:15 PM 		Reply to: Message 113 by Mazzy
06-15-2011 5:30 PM

Point Pressie!
What that research does demonstrate is that evolutionists are always grabbing at straws. These evo researchers really have no idea......
​
When was The Faith Delivered? - Apologetics Press
​
Oh Mazzy, Mazzy. You really screwed up this time.
​
You read the article on your dear Creationist site and it said just what you wanted to hear, didn't it!
​
You did not bother to follow or read the original works this intentionally misleading lying creationist screed was supposed to be reporting, did you.
​
Mazzy, inre Pressie:
​
I think you are rude and your horns are showing.
​
Well since your own cited source was indeed an outright misrepresentation of the facts then Pressie told the truth in his message, didn't he.
​
quote:
It's always easy to debunk creationists, as they only have one method: deceiving by outright lying. They project their way of thinking on others, because they think that everyone is as ignorant (or plain stupid) as they are themselves.
​
Message 101
​
Maybe in polite social circles over cheese and a fine wine telling an unpleasent truth may be considered "rude" but not in a science forum on EVC.
​
Deceiving by outright lying. And then you go and give a glaring example of precisely his point.
​
Well done, Mazzy!
​
As for the horns part, well I don't know Pressie that well but if done right horns can be very fashionable.
​
Edited by AZPaul3, : fix link
This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Mazzy, posted 06-15-2011 5:30 PM Mazzy has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024