Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,839 Year: 4,096/9,624 Month: 967/974 Week: 294/286 Day: 15/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The limitations of Sexual Selection
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4538 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


Message 27 of 36 (620373)
06-15-2011 10:25 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Percy
06-15-2011 1:20 PM


Re: A Sexual Selection Question
Percy writes:
The recent discussion prompts me to ask whether in species where males help raise the young, do we know whether drabness in males is more common? A drab male would be more likely to be around to help, so females might develop a greater preference (tolerance?) for drab males.
I believe that this is indeed the case. As I recall, it's also the case that when the male is more involved in the rearing of offspring, there is also less sexual dimorphism in general. The boys start looking more like the girls.
ABE: But I've been wrong before.
Edited by ZenMonkey, : No reason given.

Your beliefs do not effect reality and evidently reality does not effect your beliefs.
-Theodoric
Reality has a well-known liberal bias.
-Steven Colbert
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative. I believe that is so obviously and universally admitted a principle that I hardly think any gentleman will deny it.
- John Stuart Mill

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Percy, posted 06-15-2011 1:20 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Boof, posted 06-15-2011 11:07 PM ZenMonkey has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024