General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List')

If I can stick my nose in the conversation here, I personally think if Moose where to change the subject matter in your post THAT would be an issue. Also, since you referenced Him in the post as getting "moosed" He clearly did it in jest.If Moose wasn't referenced at all, (as he was basically the "subject" of your comment) I seriously doubt He would be worried about changing any capitals you may have missed. It was only a "play" on your comment, and a good one at that. All he did was acknowledge the flattery you were offering Him. IMO.

Message 283Message 286

See belowEdited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Hmmm, I have an even better idea. How about you have one SINGLE post on a thread or you're not allowed a summation?Seems reasonable to me ehe? Not one single post on the entire thread but your "summation" and I use the term loosely, and you're whining about me. Funny. Atleast I contributed.You on the other hand? Not so much.

I'm sorry but if Buz got suspended for his posts (which he shouldn't have been) then surley Theodoric should be suspended for this Message 190If he's not suspended for this but Buz was for his(?) there's a problem.BTW, Theodorics comments were in a non-evidence thread also.(ABE after nwr's post for not wanting to make another entire post and some spelling) I don't think Theodore should be banned for his comment. I'm just drawing similarities in their posts and wondering why Buz is suspended and he's not. Forum rules are forum rules and apperantly Buz broke rule #1 and #4 but Theodoric didn't.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.