Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   War and Morality. Al Qaeda v USA
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 34 of 175 (621573)
06-27-2011 1:19 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Phat
06-25-2011 5:57 AM


there continue to be random and cowardly (in my opinion) acts of terrorism against troops and civilians alike.
How do you commit an act of "terrorism" against a uniformed soldier during a state of declared hostility?
If Al-Qaeda in Iraq had killed my middle school best friend (Staff Sgt. David Day) with a bomb dropped from an airplane instead of a bomb buried by a road, would anyone call that "terrorism"? Why does it matter where the bomb was?
I don't mean to lionize these people - they're an international network of religious zealots and criminals, a testament of the "power of faith" if ever there was one. But we're shooting and killing and bombing them and their families. I don't understand why we're supposed to think it's somehow not sporting for them to shoot and bomb back.
Why are these people under such enormous social and cultural pressure to fight us?
Because we're in their goddamn homes and holy cities and there's no reason for us to be, and we won't leave for any reason at all? Jesus, Phat, if a guy was in your house killing members of your family, and asking him to stop and leave hadn't had any effect at all, what the hell would you do?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Phat, posted 06-25-2011 5:57 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Nuggin, posted 06-27-2011 1:40 AM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 35 of 175 (621574)
06-27-2011 1:20 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Phat
06-25-2011 2:25 PM


Re: Stop and think
It would be the same as if my neighbor had a rowdy house guest who scared my children and egged my car. Would it not be my neighbors responsibility to expel this house guest for the good of the neighborhood??
Exactly.
We're the guest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Phat, posted 06-25-2011 2:25 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Phat, posted 06-27-2011 12:08 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 54 of 175 (621610)
06-27-2011 11:17 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Nuggin
06-27-2011 1:40 AM


However, some of them aren't targeting soldiers, or supply depots, or engaging in delaying or distruption of infrastructure. Some of them are blowing up Red Cross buildings. Some of them are attacking people waiting in line to vote.
I don't disagree - but some of us are doing that, too.
I'm not sure I understand the difference between "illegal out-of-uniform combatant" and "private military contractor", for instance, except that the Xe/Blackwater guys are on our side and not theirs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Nuggin, posted 06-27-2011 1:40 AM Nuggin has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(1)
Message 58 of 175 (621618)
06-27-2011 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Phat
06-27-2011 12:08 PM


Re: Stop and think
We drew a line in the sand, told everyone who was for us to step onto our side, and went after the house guest.
That mission ended at Tora Bora when Bush allowed bin Laden to escape. That was ten years ago. That's the point at which we became the "bad guest", only there's nobody big and bad enough to kick us out.
Why are we still there killing people, Phat? Bin Laden is dead. The masterminds of 9/11 are dead.
What other strategy can be employed against such terror tactics?
How about "don't give a shit"? Less people died in 9/11 than died that year in motorcycle accidents. If you had absolutely no terror policy whatsoever, if the TSA didn't exist, if you could bring anything you wanted onto an airplane - a bomb, a gun, a poison gas canister, whatever you wanted - the most dangerous part of flying would still be the car ride to the airport.
Instead of being a nation of bellicose pussies, we should take a cue from the Brits and just carry the fuck on. If a terrorist gets a bomb to a cafe - shit happens, and we should find the guy that did it and make an arrest. But turning Afghanistan into the 51st US state has done absolutely nothing either to reduce global terror or combat the spread of Al-Queda.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Phat, posted 06-27-2011 12:08 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Phat, posted 06-27-2011 12:25 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 60 of 175 (621626)
06-27-2011 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Phat
06-27-2011 12:25 PM


Re: Stop and think
I guess my main question that remains unanswered is why these young professionals, most of them educated and coming from nice homes...and many not religious...joined this organization that committed to a war against the West.
Religion. Duh!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Phat, posted 06-27-2011 12:25 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Phat, posted 06-27-2011 3:58 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 63 of 175 (621651)
06-27-2011 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Phat
06-27-2011 3:58 PM


Re: Its Group Dynamics, Stupid.
but beyond protesting an abortion clinic or some anti gay crap, it never seems as if many American Christian fundamentalists would ever dare kill themselves over a cause! (I was one and am a coward!)
I grant you, it's deeply unnatural to most people to kill and die in service of a cause. I think that's probably a good thing.
But, consider this. If someone, or something, could convince you to fight for a cause, wouldn't it be most likely something originating from your religious community? Aren't those the voices you take most seriously on moral matters? If your pastor introduced a speaker one Sunday morning in church and told you this was somebody whose counsel and beliefs your pastor had enormous respect and admiration for, wouldn't you pay particularly close attention? Wouldn't you weigh those words particularly heavily?
I was a fundamentalist once, too. So I remember how it is you get there - how you start with a faith that you basically inherited, never really gave much thought to. You had a notion, however, that your faith was morally correct and that you were supposed to follow its tenets.
And then one day, somebody shows up and tells you it's not good enough. It's not enough to just be a good person - there's a spiritual war on, you're not just a regular joe, you're a soldier in a holy army. He's got the passages in the Bible to prove it. He's got the testimony of a few recent converts and they're just on fire. It's amazing! It's like they light up from the inside. You've never seen anything like it in your church, if you even ever went (which you don't, and feel guilty about), and you want more than anything in the world to feel that kind of certainty, that kind of faith, that kind of devotion. That kind of importance. Everything in your life seems unsure and maybe just a little insignificant. But here's your chance to be involved in the most important thing of all time and you won't be in it alone.
It doesn't matter what religion you are; you're already primed for this. You fell for fundamentalism just as soon as you decided that interpreting words in a book was congruent with making moral decisions, that there was a way to skip over uncomfortable moral deliberations and just look up the answers in some kind of "life's instruction manual."
Had the Pastor told us that the government was of the antichrist, and provided circumstantial evidence, as a group who knows what we would have done???
Yeah, exactly, Phat. You know exactly how it is. We should thank our lucky stars that, generally, the agenda of the average American religious leader is to get his church attendees to leave Chick tracts instead of tips when they go out for after-church brunch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Phat, posted 06-27-2011 3:58 PM Phat has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 87 of 175 (621759)
06-28-2011 6:41 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Phat
06-27-2011 11:29 PM


Re: Soft Targets vs Terrorism
As an American, I get outraged every time i see footage like that. How dare they? I feel no remorse over any casualties we cause...they should have picked their side.
"They" who? Average Afghani families?
Not a single one of the 9/11 hijackers was from Afghanistan. To my knowledge, hardly any of them had ever even been there.
Phat, what should the average Afghani family be doing to "pick their side" and thus avoid being bombed by drones?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Phat, posted 06-27-2011 11:29 PM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Nuggin, posted 06-28-2011 11:48 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 90 of 175 (621783)
06-28-2011 11:59 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by Nuggin
06-28-2011 11:48 PM


Re: Soft Targets vs Terrorism
We are in Afghanistan because Al Quida was being hosted there by the Taliban.
The 9/11 hijackers lived in Florida longer than they ever lived in Afghanistan.
When we bagged bin Laden he had been living in Pakistan for almost a decade. Should we therefore invade?
The people allegedly didn't like the Taliban.
They should have done something about them.
Done what? Die in front of AK-47's?
How about the fact that the Taliban were the only force in Afghanistan that could keep the narcotics trade down?
If they don't care about the Taliban, then we shouldn't be there at all.
We got Bin Laden. Time to go home.
Hey, now you're thinking. But that's kind of the problem, isn't it? There's no basis for saying we "won" in Afghanistan, so any time we leave it looks like a "defeat." And who is going to be the guy who gives the order and, by doing so, becomes the Man who Lost Afghanistan? Who is going to commit political suicide in order to bring our troops home? I'm not sure I blame a guy for not having that kind of courage. Politicians, after all, think they're there to have the opportunity to do good.
So, bagging bin Laden becomes an excuse for more commitment to the war, because now they're really going to be after us.
It certainly drives home the importance of not fucking starting wars. Hello, Libya!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Nuggin, posted 06-28-2011 11:48 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by Nuggin, posted 06-29-2011 12:17 AM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 93 of 175 (621790)
06-29-2011 12:54 AM
Reply to: Message 91 by Nuggin
06-29-2011 12:17 AM


Re: Soft Targets vs Terrorism
I don't care where the hijackers were from, I care about who sent them.
Saudi Arabia sent them. Most of the hijackers were Saudis - over half - and Saudi Arabia has always been the epicenter of fundamentalist Islam in the middle east.
If the Taliban had had something to do with 9/11, that would be a reasonable cause for war. When I thought they did I supported the war in Afghanistan.
If you want to call "flying remote control airplanes" a "war", then what ISN'T a war?
Come on. Don't be a tool. If dropping bombs on people from airplanes isn't a war, then what is a war?
It may, or may not, be legitimate to start a NATO war in Libya. It may, or may not, be something we're obligated to do. What's the mission? What's the end-game scenario? What possible fucking reason is there to believe that we've not just committed ourselves to a third quagmire? This isn't just academic for me, anymore - my wife is a Captain in US AMEDD, now.
I still remember "Democracy, whiskey, sexy!" in the early days of Iraq; now those people fucking hate us. How long before Libya is another massive clusterfuck where things are too fragile for us to leave and too dangerous to stay indefinitely?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Nuggin, posted 06-29-2011 12:17 AM Nuggin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 174 by crashfrog, posted 11-15-2011 4:59 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(2)
Message 174 of 175 (641033)
11-15-2011 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by crashfrog
06-29-2011 12:54 AM


Re: Soft Targets vs Terrorism
How long before Libya is another massive clusterfuck where things are too fragile for us to leave and too dangerous to stay indefinitely?
Just wanted to come back to this and say - I was happy to have been proven completely wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by crashfrog, posted 06-29-2011 12:54 AM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by Panda, posted 11-15-2011 5:41 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024