ZenMonkey writes:
If you don't mind me saying so, Chuck, this would be a terrible time for you to quit.
Taq writes:
Actually, this is the least foolish thing you have posted on these forums. Discovering ignorance is a good thing. Wallowing in ignorance is a bad thing. Sadly, many creationists prefer the latter. I have high hopes that you will opt for the former.
Of course I don't mind Zen and thanks Taq. I have a "knack" for getting into subjects that sometimes im not too familiar with based on things i've read or heard. I not quiting, im just at a stale mate as to where this whole debate is. The more I read the more I understand I shouldn't be debating this. I think I threw myself into the discussions to fast. I was pretty much arguing my "ideas" as opposed to Science. Maybe Creationism should be seperate from Science all together. If someone wants to learn what Creationism is then they can any time they want, and based on what they read/learn can determine which way to go.
I guess the whole thing boils down to Science VS Creationism. I suppose the two can just exist seperatly. If we didn't try to impose on Science so much we wouldn't get half the flack we do. On the other hand, if a Creationism can come up with a plausable theory of it's own that would be great. If not, then we just seperate the two and people can decide on there own. I know this doesn't make sense to either of you as you're saying "CHUCK, people will choose the evidence EVERY time, Creationism has none, what's that tell you! How hard is this to figure out!" Yeah, I hear ya, but as crazy as it sounds I do believe that Creation is the result of a Creator as the Bible says. (sorry for mentioning the Bible, im confused on where this thread is heading or what I should/can say). it's just to hard for me to imagine that TOE and the big bang occured(or is occuring). Im more of an ID'ist I suppose(I know what your gonna say) it seems logical to me that we were designed (as your saying it seems logical to follow the evidence). As for the flood, well, I can't say. Like I said, Im giving up arguing it but not totally abandoning it.
This is probably really off topic but Im not sure of the topic anymore...lol.
BTW, im not saying that ID is anymore "Scientific" than Creationsim but I do happen to think it is a little more "progressed" so to speak than Creationism. I know some/a lot think they are the same but that's a discussion for another thread.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.