What do you mean have in common. Because we were alive. A chimp has a similar skeleton now to humans and looks absolutely nothing like a human.
"Similar" and "nothing like" are antonyms.
I can contemplate the hereafter, and have superior reasoning and perceptual ability, and best of all I do not have long hair growing all over my body.
I believe you about the hereafter and the hair.
Oh no that is not what I said at all. What I have said previously is that the use and control of fire is a complex task. There were no matches. magnifying glass or lighters for erectus. He would have had to have worked out how to use flintstone or stick rubbing, a complex task. I alledge, with its small brain even if I believed it was on its way to humanity, erectus was not smart enough to use and control fire.
What your researchers have found are either fires started naturally, or with hearths, evidence that someone smarter was about at the same time. eg human beings.
You have, of course, no evidence for these assertions.
The arising of a single cell is in the rubbish bin now. Do not forget with the advent of HGT you now have multiple primitive cells arising. These poofed into existence individually and yet were so genetically similar that they were able to horizonatlly transfer genes. Life on this planet will only ever have the same basic genetic blueprint. It does not show we all came from the same cell. In fact your research now shows we didn't. LUCA is dead and so are your genomic comparisons as HGT has confounded your models into a complexity meltdown.
This illiterate nonsense is off-topic.
As for walking upright there is not better term than to say " What Rubbish".
If you can really do no better than to produce a bizarre non sequitur, I think you ought to give up now.
That is flavour of the month. Not too long ago bipedalism was theorised to be connected to brain increase. That has been proven wrong.
What are you talking about?
Neanderthal was also once pictured to be a stooped ape based on its fossils, but now stand perfectly upright.
Actually, the stooped specimen (La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1) is still stooped, since your gibberish has failed to cure his arthritis.
Your reconstructions are biased.
You have not pointed out the imaginary bias.
Besides chimps can walk upright regardless of being knuckle walkers, it has squat to do with becoming human.
And we can hop on one leg. So what? We have anatomical adaptations for being bipedal which chimps lack.
I have given proof that there was flat faced apes around 12mya. Flatter facial features are NOT a sign of becoming human. Erectus has heavy brows, pronaganathism, long arms, large bones, large rounded rib cage. Why I'd say he probably looks just like Lluc.
And you are laughably wrong, as we have seen.
DNA..I have provided evidence from the Chimpanzee genome project that chimps and humans differ by at least 30%.
As you would know if you were literate, that is a measure of alignment, and does not contradict other figures for similarity.
The simply and obvious thing is that some creature on this earth had to be more similar to us than the rest. It happens to be chimps.
But why do chimpanzees have to be closer to
us than
they are to anything else?
"Chimpanzees seem almost human, and scientists have maintained for decades that chimps are, in fact, 98.5 percent genetically identical to humans.
But the results of a new study call that figure into question, with a finding that there are actually large chunks of the human and chimp genomes that are vastly different. "
You Can't Make a Monkey Out of Us | WIRED#
The article to which you refer (in
Wired, for heaven's sake) states: "The study didn't generate a new number expressing how similar or different chimpanzee DNA is from human DNA."
ERV's show nothing more than some species were in the same place and were exposed to some bug.
"Within the published human genome sequence, there are over 98,000 human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs), but all are defective, containing nonsense mutations or major deletions. No replication-competent HERVs have been identified to date (26, 31, 33, 35), with only one (K113) with open reading frames for all genes (35), and thus their activity and infectivity is thought to have decreased substantially from levels occurring during earlier periods of primate evolution (1, 23, 34). "
Just a moment...
Humans can catch Hendra virus but are not closely related to bats or horses. This is just straw grabbing nonsense, made from convoluted mathematical models that mean nothing in the end. You have nonsense mutations and major deletions and it is all guesswork, assumpions and down hill from there.
I suggest that you read up on ERVs until you understand the point; or until you die of old age, whichever comes sooner.
The genetic comparisons your researchers use are very simplistic. They take a handfull of enzymes, stain them with dyes and use this nonsense as the basis to describe and compare an incredibly complex genomic system.
But I have a dream that one day we will be able to sequence entire genomes ...
... oh, wait.
I have refuted morphology, DNA comparison and ERV's as being any more than theoretical assumptions based on further assumptions and convoluted models and in no way appear to detract from my assertion that there were never any chimp/human intermediates.
A more accurate description of what you have done would be "screamed ignorant and illiterate nonsense".
Creationists may not have all the answers either.
Hey, you said something true!
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
(1)