Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8896 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-21-2019 11:48 PM
103 online now:
AZPaul3, DrJones*, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), ramoss (4 members, 99 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,536 Year: 3,573/19,786 Month: 568/1,087 Week: 158/212 Day: 25/49 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1234
5
Author Topic:   Transitional forms in existence today
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16085
Joined: 07-20-2006
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 61 of 62 (624289)
07-17-2011 3:52 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Dr Jack
07-16-2011 5:58 AM


Re: Interpretation
Quite so. I don't mean to imply that Archaeopteryx, for example, is a direct ancestor of modern birds. Even if it was, we wouldn't know it.

(Actually, I'm of the opinion that it almost certainly wasn't, because it has no uncinate processes on its ribs.)


This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Dr Jack, posted 07-16-2011 5:58 AM Dr Jack has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16085
Joined: 07-20-2006
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 62 of 62 (624290)
07-17-2011 3:54 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by pandion
07-17-2011 2:31 AM


Re: Interpretation
If you take away the feathers, it takes an expert to distinguish between the dinosaur Compsognathus and the bird Archaeopteryx.

I think the forelimbs are a bit of a giveaway. But apart from that, yes.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by pandion, posted 07-17-2011 2:31 AM pandion has not yet responded

  
Prev1234
5
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019