The Ultimate Question - Why is there something rather than nothing?

Hmm i have my own crackpot theory on this Given that we do not see nothing in nature a pure vacuum is theoretically impossible because virtual particles would still come in and out of exsistance inside that vacuum even if you get everything else out of it (radiation, gravity, matter ...). One can therefore conclude that nothing is an "unnatural" state there hasto be something even if that something is 1-1 that equals nothing but is in fact not nothing.

And that nothing is something its the absence of nothing, i say nothing is impossible "unnatural" there always has to be something even if it adds up to nothing.

So wait your god can be eternal and needs no creation while every other thing needs creation.Let me put a diferent crackpot theory up for grabs.0 is an unnatural state and it cant be found anywhere eccept on paper.
We see nothing produce virtual particles particles that in one moment come into exsistance in pairs then colide and go out of exsistance in the next moment they last for such a short time that they are not considered part of reality.Lets say space can do the same it pops into exsistance for a short while then collides with negative space and goes out of exsistance again.so now lets propose that space comes into exsistance with negative space but a colission with anoter positive space deflects it away from the path it was on to collide with negative space. Now we have 2 permanent pozitive spaces and 2 negative that will not collide because their tregectaries have been altered.Now lets propose that the same thing happenes inside the space so we get a box inside the box.Now in space virtual particles form all the time but like if they forme on the edge of an event horizon of a black hole where one part gets sucked into a black hole and the other wanders freely the same thing happens in the outside box a virual particle gets trapped inside the smaller inside box and one floats around freelyThe smaller box slowly but surely gets filled up by these virtual particles they can enter but cannot escape. And at one point the "walls" of the small box cannot hold they brake and we get the big bang you know the rest form there.So in fact we got something from nothing but if you add that something up you end up with nothing again, it is only something as long it is sepperated.

No glitch nothing is an unnatural unstable state that has a tendency to divide itself in to equal positive end negative parts, the nothing itself created everything that is in fact nothing. Space metter .... no pre universe matter laws or anything requiredLaws are created as soon as stuff like space is created from nothing laws are just properties of "stuff". Edited by frako, : No reason given.

Relative to staying nothing Zero after that it dosent matter NOTHING !!!!! as in 2+(-2) = 0 Parts as in space, matter energy .... .Edited by frako, : No reason given.

Titane – Advertising AgencyLets just ask god he seems a bit dodgy but has better anwsers then IamJoshep

You realy dont know what evolution is right? Hows about a RNA molecule that copies itself with flaws can that be "evolutionised"? Yes NO Life is way older then 5 million years more like 3 billion, and what realy kicked off evolution was multicellular organisms it took some time forthem to evolve, then the other kick was land based organisms. Yes NO (at least for life on earth witch "copies" itself with flaws) Well yes NO Like observation, hypothesis, experimentation, prediction, peer rewive, more testing more predictions theory ... fact.(well techincaly the theory of evolution is a theory the method of how things evolved)(and the fact of evolution is a fact things have evolved) Well no the agenda of creationism is to counter evolution and bring bibles back into school and it has no grounds in science and scientific criteria. Quite right when you are religius it is hard to spot manipulation of facts, and evidence because it makes you feel all warm inside when your fary tale has some "evidence" to back itself up. Really how so? Are we bombing people to fight of other view's like the muslims or the christians (if you happened to miss the latest christian bombing a guy in oslo placed a bomb there then went to an island and shot 80 or so kids) Well no evolution is fact and the theory of evolution is a theory, creationism is a farry tale. Well no we are doing quite fine in explaining nature way better then the religious before us. You know lightnig is caused by thors hammer, the rainbow is a sighn from god .. all that silly stuff has been replaced with real explenations. So accepting an untestable, invisible, unevidenced being is more scientific then rejecting it?

Ok let me try his methodlet me quote you again

Stephen Hawking: God did not create the Universe | Daily Mail OnlineSo there the anwser hy there is something rather then nothing. Edited by frako, : No reason given.

nope it is nothing until it happens

Thats the whole if a tree falls in the forest and no one can hear it dose it make a sound thing right?