Robert Byers
Member (Idle past 4660 days) Posts: 640 From: Toronto,canada Joined: 02-06-2004
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
Message 9 of 16 (626086)
07-27-2011 1:53 AM
|
|
|
Who knows if having 44 wasn't very common in the past?
It certainly means its irrelevant.
Chromosomes are over rated.
It doesn't make any difference.
genetics is not a trail of heritage but only shows like features equals like atomic scorecard.
Father to son is just a special case.
In fact if the 44 man had only been found in some ancient deposit or cave they probably would of insisted it showed evolution of a previous stage of mankind.
Whew! That was close!
|
™ Version 4.2