Information's role in evolution.Should we put it more in the picture?

This line of reasoning limits this board to contributions by scientists only. Why have a debate board limited to persons of one discpline.
The reason, I a layman, cite authority for my positions is that I do not have the scientific training to reply to many scientific points.However, I can read what other scientists say and use them as authority for my position.It is not armchair philosphy, it is opinions based upon the knowledge of experts in the field, cited to support our opinions.

Yes I would. I have down loaded the paper, I like to read, highlight, and digest before I comment.
What protocol do you suggest in walking through the paper?

Hi Taq. I have read and reread the "Materials and Methods" section and the "Results" section and I am not really going to discuss those sections with you.
In my opinion I would need at least a Bachelors degree in biolog to intelligently discuss those sectons and most likely a Doctorate.I do believe I can talk about the Abstract and Discusion sections where the authors set forth what they believe the work they have done demonstrates.
I can also discuss what I interpret those opinions to mean for the theory of evolution.
Sorry.