Kent Hovind

So, how does this affect the proposition of creationism as a logical principle. Do you even understand what the argument is or is not Shouting and waving your arms in the air Dwise doesnt a good argument make. My suggestion is that you take a close look at my arguments, present them, then attempt to refute themNobody is paying attention to your tantrums, but we pay very close attention to your unwillingness to respond specifically to presented argumentsReally Dwise, is this how your superiors in the military taught you how to act, like a childYoull impress me when you actually respond to the argument in my postYour tantrums are not a good distraction. Give it a try Dwise, see what happensDawn BertotEdited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

Creationism is a religious belief, not a "logical principle."Creation "science" was invented after creationism was banished by the courts. But creation "science" was itself shortly thereafter banished, as was it's stepchild, "intelligent design."All of these were disallowed because they are religion, not science.And still creationism is a religious belief in spite of these attempts to take on the trappings, and respect, relegated to science.

We pay very close attention to your unwillingness to respond specifically to presented arguments.

I would very much love to have a public debate with yourself, Dwise. My obligation in the debate would be staying awake during one of your speaches that make no attempt at arguments presenteddear God in heaven, I read through this vacuous speach and still no attempt at an argumentDo you even understand the principles of debate. never have I ever seen one seasoned debator of the Churches of Christ struggling or faltering in debates with Atheist, evos or anyother topic for that matter get out and about more and you find more than polished speeches A total misrepresentation if ever I saw oneDawn Bertot

try and think deeper C. Creationism and science are terms. The reality of the situation is that all things are testable logical propositions agaisnt a demonstratable realitySomething is logically demonstratable regardless of terms and concepts. If I called creationism a football and evolution a usda grade A bag of dufuss, (say like dwise), it would not change the reality of its logical possibilitesIts either logically demonstratable or it is not, no matter what term you put on itDawn BertotEdited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

xEdited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

Read my post again the argument is there. Look alittle deeper and if you still cant see it Illl present it again. Its sad that I should have to do that with such a self-proclaimed educated person as yourselfdawn bertotEdited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

Yes, I do understand the argument, unlike you.And how does this affect the "proposition of creationism as a logical principle"? Absoluta-fracking-lutly not in the slightest bit. Nothing in this topic ever had anything at all to do with that. Duh??Coyote was saying that there is no concensus whatsoever to judge the validity of creationist claims. Period. Punkt. Was anderes erwartest du, Knabe? Then you barge in and inject all kinds of extraneous garbage. What part of that do you not understand?All you ever post is garbage. You pay lip service to "logic", and yet you have repeatedly displayed absolute ignorance of logic. We directly challenged you and you ran away immediately, remember? If absolutely required to, I will research back through the posts here. Will you even begin to have the balls (questionable given your girly name) to stand up to that kind of challenge? You know that I will. And you know full well that you will not be able to stand up to that kind of exposition. Let's put it this way: I am half Scottish, nearly half Irish, and about a 16th German. The Scottish part will not put up with yer bullshit and the German part will methodically tear you apart. Oh? Do you actually have an argument? Care to enlighten us as to what it is?

Then show why in argument form, not in one of your mind numbing speeches Please by all means, do one of two things, either show what i have ran form or make attempt at a single argument in my post in this or anyother thread.Id like to research you NOT doing that, but ofcourse I cant find something that is not thereDo you even understand that creationism is a term, not a reality. The reality of creationism is its logical tenets as an argument. its not to be connected with religion or evolution.Its testable in logical form or it is not.Foe heavens sake please do the research of which boastDawn BertotEdited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

Granted! Written format!Girly name or not, do you have the huevos?If you truly believe that having a written format has no effect, then what are you afraid of?

Oh frickin' frak! You forgot how to write sentences. A huge step backwards!

Please dear God in heaven, give this man the ability, time and skills to accomplish such a taskDawn Bertot

We pay very close attention to your unwillingness to respond specifically to presented arguments.

It doesn't take much ability to find at least one point you have studiously avoiding answering.
Jar has posted it several times.
I have posted it several times.I'll post it again... We pay very close attention to your unwillingness to respond specifically to presented arguments.

This forum does give us the tools for accomplishing my task. Even though it does take some work.Your days are numbered, you fucking liar! Which is to say, "typical creationist". Edited by dwise1, : No reason given.