Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Kent Hovind
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 158 of 182 (626926)
07-31-2011 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by IamJoseph
07-31-2011 10:37 PM


Re: Logic dermands
There is evidence of natural causes.
Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.
Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.
Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.
Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods does not make them true.
It really is that simple.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2011 10:37 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 161 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2011 11:13 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 170 of 182 (626985)
08-01-2011 8:10 AM
Reply to: Message 161 by IamJoseph
07-31-2011 11:13 PM


Re: Logic dermands
I said Natural cause.
I have a puddle in my back yard, the cause is that it rained.
There is evidence of natural causes.
Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.
Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.
Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.
Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods does not make them true.
It really is that simple.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2011 11:13 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 173 by IamJoseph, posted 08-01-2011 8:55 AM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 174 of 182 (626993)
08-01-2011 9:01 AM
Reply to: Message 173 by IamJoseph
08-01-2011 8:55 AM


Re: Logic dermands
Utter bullshit as expected.
Please provide evidence I ever referred to "MR/MRS/MS NATURE"
It rained, Rain is natural. The puddle filled. That is natural.
I said Natural cause.
I have a puddle in my back yard, the cause is that it rained.
There is evidence of natural causes.
Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.
Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.
Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.
Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods does not make them true.
It really is that simple.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by IamJoseph, posted 08-01-2011 8:55 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by IamJoseph, posted 08-01-2011 9:20 AM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 176 of 182 (626995)
08-01-2011 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 175 by IamJoseph
08-01-2011 9:20 AM


Re: Logic dermands
Good for you, but as expected, utterly irrelevant.
Please provide evidence I ever referred to "MR/MRS/MS NATURE"
It rained, Rain is natural. The puddle filled. That is natural.
I said Natural cause.
I have a puddle in my back yard, the cause is that it rained.
There is evidence of natural causes.
Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.
Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.
Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.
Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods and irrelevancies does not make them true or relevant.
It really is that simple.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by IamJoseph, posted 08-01-2011 9:20 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by IamJoseph, posted 08-01-2011 9:40 AM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 182 of 182 (627185)
08-01-2011 9:48 AM
Reply to: Message 179 by IamJoseph
08-01-2011 9:40 AM


Re: Logic dermands
Good for you, but as expected, utterly irrelevant.
No one cares what you accept, that has NOTHING to do with truth or reality.
Please provide evidence I ever referred to "MR/MRS/MS NATURE"
It rained, Rain is natural. The puddle filled. That is natural.
I said Natural cause.
I have a puddle in my back yard, the cause is that it rained.
There is evidence of natural causes.
Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.
Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.
Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.
Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods and irrelevancies does not make them true or relevant.
It really is that simple.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by IamJoseph, posted 08-01-2011 9:40 AM IamJoseph has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024