The Flood, fossils, & the geologic evidence

Thankfully what you know has absolutely nothing to do with reality.The educated are not limited by your lack of knowledge.

It's not. It's not. It wasn't and in fact has never been. Also didn't happen. Not only is species not a part of Genesis, the "kinds" mentioned there are also not valid. No, it wasn't. Also wrong. There are writings which pre-date Genesis. The Epic of Gilgamesh for example. Also wrong. The Babylonians had days and weeks recorded before Genesis was written. Extremely wrong. Wrong in the sense that what's in the Bible even REMOTELY addresses these rights. Wrong in the sense that there is separation. And EXTREMELY wrong in the sense that any of this is exclusive to the Bible. Also no, Sumerians had writing before the Bible was written. I think the Chinese would dispute that. While THOUSANDS more are not recorded. Meanwhile the Incas had recordings of cultures not mentioned in the Bible. There is no archaeological proof for any magical event recorded in the Bible.There is only archaeological evidence that the locations in which the authors decided to set their story were existing places.This is also true of Troy. There's PLENTY of archaeological proof for Troy and therefore the Trojan War.By your standard, that means there's proof for the entire Greek pantheon which disproves the Jew's claim to one true god.Basically, you've presented a long list of errors based on your assumption that if an author writes "this is the first thing that happened" then whatever paper he wrote that on is the oldest recording ever.Not even close to being true.

The Universe. Are you suggesting that the law of gravity is an unbreakable rule of the Universe which can never be avoided under any circumstances? The fact that we can see light does not mean that light is an "entity". You measure EVERYTHING by light. You measure time by light when you look at a clock. You measure height by light when you look at a ruler. You measure heat by light when you look at a thermometer.We measure the Universe by light because we are looking at it, not because the Universe is "made of light". Water is not separated from land at all. Show me where on Earth water does not touch land. First, your claim is that kinds = species. That's false. Second, the Bible is not the first place didn't "kinds" of animals are recorded. Cave paintings clearly show different animals and predate the Bible by 2-3X the entire age of the Earth (going by your Bible count). Saying that Creationism is evolution is not evolution. It's just you being pathetic. The earliest fragment of Genesis is from ~100 AD.
Epic of Gilgamesh is ~ 700 BC.Nice try though. You are claiming that Babylonians never had calendars, and your reasoning is that they used the moon.What do you think a calendar is? Why do you think we call them "Months" (MOONths).Look, I get it, you are REQUIRED to *** for Jesus otherwise you have to sacrifice a baby or something. Just pick lies that do make you look so f(@king ***. SUNday, MOONday, ODENSday, THORSday, FRYSDAY, SATURNSDAY -- does ANY of that sound REMOTELY JEWISH to you?How about the clearly LATIN month names? Or the months named after JULIUS and AUGUSTUS Caesar?Your claims are LAUGHABLE. Fail. Our legal system is based on Roman law. We do not have laws prohibiting the consumption of shell fish. We do not have laws prohibiting the wearing of clothing without tassels. CLEARLY our legal system is not based on the Jews. Oh, so you want "pages"? Show me an ancient copy of Genesis which is in a book? You can't. Even the MODERN Torah is not "pages". It's ONE PAGE rolled up.Wow, you just don't know a thing about any of this do you? The fact that you admit that the Chinese are old than the Jews means that your entire argument FAILS at the start. If God made the JEWS ONLY, where the F did the Chinese come from? Again, you are saying that proof that a city existed is evidence that a story about that city is true. That's not a valid claim.I can prove archaeologically that London exists. Does that make Harry Potter real?

Haha I know. But, you gotta remember, we're talking about the Bible. No clouds could have existed until after the Great Flood since rainbows didn't exist.That means either water was never in the air before then -or- water was completely opaque -or- light didn't refract at all so the world was in black and white (not grey even).

I would like to point out that it is more than a little unfair to expect Iamjoseph to stay on topic in a thread asking for evidence for a myth.Obviously since it's make believe, there's not going to be any real evidence.We all know that. Hell, even Joseph knows that. If he didn't, he'd be trying to present actual evidence rather than randomly quoting stuff out of the Bible.The more I think about it, the more unfair the whole site seems.Instead of EVC shouldn't it be RVF? Reality vs Fantasy forums?