|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 4442 days) Posts: 415 From: Australia Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What is the creation science theory of the origin of light? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Butterflytyrant writes:
You seem to be getting frustrated, so I suggest taking a break from replying to IamJoseph. Is your grasp on reality that slim?No-one will think less of you for not wanting to roll around with IamJoseph in his incoherent pit of ignorance, superstition and madness. Trying to pull meaning out of his paralogical spaghetti is a pointless task. (I wonder how many people will have to criticise his language skills before he realises that he may have a problem...)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
You clearly didn't understand what I wrote - which is not a surprise.
Is the universe you exist in - finite or infinite? If its not a stupid question.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
Do you consider all electromagnetic radiation to be light?
Consider that the age of the universe is measured by light, such as the residual radiation speed derived time period IamJoseph writes:
Could you provide a link to a web-site showing that this is what the big bang theory states? Consider that the BBT displays a BANG/EXPLOSION as the first action - this also says light was the first product, because no stars, radiation or torch batteries yet existed.Perhaps you could point me to the relevant passage on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_Theory? Also, it now seems that you are saying that light is not radiation. I would help if you were a little more consistent. Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
Why make claims about what the BBT implies? This is an abuse of the proof criteria; however all descriptions of the BBT use the term BANG and EXPLOSION, which infers only a flash of light before any other result; namely because light has a transcendent velosity and will be seen/percieved before any other factor.Why not read what it actually says? So ... please provide a link to a source that says that the BBT involves an explosion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
I keep forgetting that you do not believe us when we say your English is appalling.
Why do you not believe us? Ask a friend to read your posts: see what they say. Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
How about you go and actually read what the BBT is, and not just guess what it is from its name.
How about "BANG!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
How are they problematic? The last two posts are problematic in identifying any specific issues.The specific issue is your poor grasp of English.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
All of it. Its not specific at all. Which part?quote:It sounds like a complicated sentence badly translated into Englsih by Babel Fish. But you need not re-word your post. Life is too short to spend it repeatedly asking you for clarification on what you think each word means.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
As I said in my last post:
Panda writes:
Life is too short to spend it repeatedly asking you for clarification on what you think each word means.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Admin writes:
Which I think IamJ addressed with:
Science postulates a quark soup at the beginning, and certainly electromagnetic radiation would have been part of that soup. IamJospeph writes:
*scratches head* The issue of electricity and magnetic forms of energy are later derivitive factors;*gives up and walks away*
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Read the next post...
Edited by Panda, : ButterflyTyrant did it better.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
It is not funny. Hm. The age of your universe is calculated by jelly; not from residual light imprints? Very interesting but not funny.It is not meant to be funny. Clearly you are unable to prove the jelly statement false and you are left with only ridicule.The age of the universe is calculated from residual jelly imprints and has nothing to do with light. Absolutely check mate is in order and you are sweating. Ridiculing what you cannot counter is a good indication. Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Why jelly cannot have a true definition.
If it is a first product, it cannot be described by aligning it with other products: those never yet existed. One cannot speak of light or lemons here - these never existed yet - else you violate the finite factor of this universe. Is the message getting through at all!? Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
All we did was change your word 'light' to our word 'jelly' and repeat exactly you said. You forgot to mention jelly is also ageless and massless and how scientists measure light by it.Do you not find it strange that you cannot actually argue against what we are writing? Instead you have to resort to ridicule. Why not argue against our statements?Show them to be less evidenced than your statements - go on, I dare you. I bet you cannot. Edited by Panda, : No reason given. Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3733 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
IamJoseph writes:
What is the creation science theory of the origin of light?
Which is the first recording dealing with a finite universe?Which is the first recording Light was the first product in the universe? Which is the first recording which introduced the DAY & WEEK? Which is the first recording of life form groupings by category?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024