Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,814 Year: 3,071/9,624 Month: 916/1,588 Week: 99/223 Day: 10/17 Hour: 6/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Implied by YEC? Most science is faulty?
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5872 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 15 of 36 (6275)
03-08-2002 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Punisher
03-07-2002 11:54 PM


Punisher: Just curious. What long geological processes is Mount St. Helens supposed to have disproved?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Punisher, posted 03-07-2002 11:54 PM Punisher has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Punisher, posted 03-08-2002 7:18 AM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5872 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 19 of 36 (6305)
03-08-2002 8:29 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Punisher
03-08-2002 7:18 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Punisher:
Please see my last post. It didn't disprove anything; it simply showed us that once thought long processes in nature do not necesarily require that much time. Are you deliberately being obtuse?

No, are you deliberately being a jerk?
Perhaps you misunderstood my question. Allow me to rephrase it: "What processes, evidenced by the results of the pyroclastic flow and lahar produced by the eruption of Mount Saint Helens, were shown to require less time than originally believed by mainstream geology?"
That simple and specific enough?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Punisher, posted 03-08-2002 7:18 AM Punisher has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Punisher, posted 03-08-2002 9:32 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024