The problems of big bang theory. What are they?

Al, Joseph,You do know what the "singularity" is, do you not?When we use our theories to run the universe backward we come to a period just a small split second after the "beginning" where our theories break down. They cannot show us what the universe was or what it looked like from that point back.We cannot say, and so you cannot say, what the attributes of this period were (called the singularity only because it needs some name so we can have conversations about it), what rules or laws applied or did not apply or what conditions, energies, temperatures, or anything else about this "thing" were. It is a period of total ignorance for us. Since the known "laws of physics" do not apply neither do your conclusions. The Big Bang Theory is not based on the singularity but on the periods of our knowledge well after the singularity period. Your assumption is faulty and thus so is your conclusion.Edited by AZPaul3, : In bold changed "before" to "after". Thanks for the correction, Moose.

Don't know where to start. What a overwhelming dump of nonsensical BS. Apparently English is not your native, nor foreign, language.And the rest of this slop of indecipherable garbage is not worth the effort to attempt any kind of translation even if we had some kind of rosetta stone.I think I'll pass on this one.

The colliding branes of M-Theory do not contradict or replace Big Bang. It is an attempt to suggest how the Big Bang happened. This might help.

I'm trying to recall where, but as I understand there are two solutions in QFT that give rise to virtual particles. One gives the spontaneous creation/annihilation of pairs and the other gives the creation/annihilation of pairs from the disturbances of neighboring virtual events.So, yes, virtual pairs may indeed be caused by disturbances (prior virtual pair creation/annihilation) in the force (spacetime).You may in fact be right and didn't need the smiley after all!

Some people just have no appreciation for the work of others.Look at what he made in 6 days. An entire beautiful universe.Can you imagine what he would have made given the whole pre-universe eternity?Must be one hell of a place!All that effort and you really don't want to go see?

OK. I'll take a lima bean. Done. No. There is a bowl with soup in it and now with a lima bean as well. What the hell you talking about? It's a bowl of soup with a lima bean in it! What singularity? I don't see any singularity. I see my bowl of soup with a lima bean floating on top! This has nothing to do with my bowl of soup or the lima bean! No, it doesn't. What does any of this have to do with the Big Bang or my bowl of soup?You are not making any sense at all!

And what is admissible as a singularity? Do you even know what a "singularity" is, Joe, the kind of "singularity" we reference in the Big Bang and Black Holes? Do you have any idea what you are talking about?