A population can not exceed it's available food source for any sustained period of time. End of story.
But with 5 trillion people there, think of all the Soylent Green they'd have. They could feed multitudes!
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
This is a myth. Australia is surrounded by H20 and has more water than the middle-east, which is also half desert. Sparse population still cannot justify no evidences at all for 60K years.
Surrounded by _salt water_ which clearly you have been drinking.
AND, you are desperately trying to change topics. "evidences at all for 60k years"??! WTF does that have to do with your claim that there should be 5 trillion Australians.
Could 5 trillion people living in Australia TODAY? Right now? Even with worldwide food production? We wouldn't have enough people over the entire rest of the world to produce and transport enough food fast enough to support that many people in Australia. And we have PLANES.
Clearly population size is limited by resources.
Until you admit that, there's really no reason for you to type anything.
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
So you accept that today's population of some 6.5B is resultant from 30K years ago - or even 60K?
Modern humans (archaic variety) developed on the close order of 200,000 years ago.
But your argument is clearly flawed: the growth rate of bacteria is such that if they multiplied as you imply humans do they would exceed the mass of the earth in short order, and the mass of the universe not long after.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Why are you asking me what kind it is? Do you not know? But since 'winged creatures' is not a 'kind' listed in the bible - I would expect that you are wrong.
Where do mosquitoes fit into your 'kinds'? Are they land kind; are they water kind or are the airborne kind?
None of that had anything at all to do with the topic.
Simple question: Among those Christian groups that would embrace "creation science", commonly called "fundamentalists" though that term properly applied is too narrow, is the purpose of education to compel the students to adopt certain beliefs?
Your frog leaping, as seen in most responses here. The issue was the first recording of life form groupings. Otherwise start a thread of the most colorful deflection strategies.
quote:Why are you asking me what kind it is? Do you not know? But since 'winged creatures' is not a 'kind' listed in the bible - I would expect that you are wrong. Where do mosquitoes fit into your 'kinds'? Are they land kind; are they water kind or are the airborne kind?
I wasn't asking - I was reminding you to read before wasting virtual ink. 'Winged creatures' are surely listed, even as emerging from the waters, in the only hard copy texts greater than 2,300 years old.
™ Version 4.1
(1)
