|
Author
|
Topic: What's The Best Solution For Humanity?
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: To quote Bender: We're boned
Got a new kitty?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 3 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-30-2011 11:53 PM | | Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 36 of 301 (634626)
09-23-2011 7:06 AM
|
Reply to: Message 34 by IamJoseph
09-23-2011 5:42 AM
|
|
The greater the population; the greater the pollution - the greater chance humanity will see the light. So we need to hit rock bottom before we realise our mistakes? Makes sense.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 34 by IamJoseph, posted 09-23-2011 5:42 AM | | IamJoseph has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 46 of 301 (634648)
09-23-2011 9:09 AM
|
Reply to: Message 37 by IamJoseph
09-23-2011 7:17 AM
|
|
Quite the closet Imperialists, aren't you?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 37 by IamJoseph, posted 09-23-2011 7:17 AM | | IamJoseph has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 49 of 301 (634659)
09-23-2011 9:49 AM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by IamJoseph
09-23-2011 9:37 AM
|
|
Do the maths I can't. I don't know how. Please show me.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 48 by IamJoseph, posted 09-23-2011 9:37 AM | | IamJoseph has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 53 of 301 (634720)
09-23-2011 2:23 PM
|
Reply to: Message 50 by IamJoseph
09-23-2011 9:54 AM
|
|
Oh kaaaaay. This is me stepping back and moving slowly away from the crazy person. This is me getting far enough away to feel safe to turn my back on the crazy person and legging it.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 50 by IamJoseph, posted 09-23-2011 9:54 AM | | IamJoseph has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 58 of 301 (634802)
09-24-2011 5:03 AM
|
Reply to: Message 55 by IamJoseph
09-24-2011 1:39 AM
|
|
I deride you prognosticatory abilities.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 55 by IamJoseph, posted 09-24-2011 1:39 AM | | IamJoseph has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 137 of 301 (634983)
09-25-2011 10:19 AM
|
Reply to: Message 136 by frako
09-25-2011 4:35 AM
|
|
Re: Solution Emerging
Nope it factors everything in that effects how much water can saturate air. What stupid thing to say! Nowhere on you silly graph does it mention god.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 136 by frako, posted 09-25-2011 4:35 AM | | frako has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2