Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9045 total)
541 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1 (2 members, 539 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Upcoming Birthdays: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 887,196 Year: 4,842/14,102 Month: 440/707 Week: 171/197 Day: 60/55 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ontological arguments - where's the beef?
Percy
Member
Posts: 20236
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 5 of 74 (631888)
09-04-2011 7:27 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by cavediver
09-03-2011 4:59 PM


Hi Cavediver

My overall reaction is, "What a bunch of hooey!" Doesn't seem worthy of any attention at all, but I understand the argument, "Some of the most famous philosophers of history have seriously studied this issue, perhaps I should take a look."

What drew my interest was this:

cavediver writes:

While still a Christian, I had no need for proofs of God - faith was central to my, well, faith...So, following my Damascus Road conversion to atheism...

Why travel all the way from faith to atheism? Perhaps it's just that all the world's religions are wrong, simply because of the unavailability of decent evidence. Maybe even the concept of God or god or gods is itself wrong. But there seems insufficient evidence to conclude that there couldn't be something out there with intentional purpose, but on the scale of all of existence rather than of personal lives. Naturally this discards the possibility of a personal God.

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by cavediver, posted 09-03-2011 4:59 PM cavediver has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by bluegenes, posted 09-04-2011 9:00 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply
 Message 9 by cavediver, posted 09-04-2011 11:44 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021