Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   For Percy (New Section)
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 11 (631978)
09-05-2011 12:39 AM


Hi Percy, I have a suggestion. I think this is the right place to ask or suggest so forgive me if it isn't.
I've been following and reading your back and forths with Buzz and was also just reading Taz's new thread. This is my suggestion:
How about a "Creationsim" section on the site? You have Science, Social/Religion etc...but no actual "Creationsim'.
Putting in a Creationism section would eliminate a lot of problems IMO and atleast would maybe welcome more people to debate it.
IOW, if there is a Science section(Science Forums) on EvC(Evolution-V-Creation), then maybe there should be a Creation(ism) section- (Creation(ism) Forums) too.
What do you think Percy?
Also Percy, before you say "Chuck, If you are claiming Creationism should be considered Scientific and credible then you should have no problem fitting it in with the Science forums, what gives? Why do you wan't your own PseudoScience section? You are here to argue that Creation Scientists are doing Science so I don't see the problem. Are you admitting that Creationism isn't Science? If it's not then what is this ENTIRE debate ABOUT Chuck!?!? And why are we debating it!?"
Good questions Percy. Well, it seems people here are at odds about what evidence really is or isn't and what can or can't be used. Maybe this would help.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by NoNukes, posted 09-05-2011 2:13 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 3 by PaulK, posted 09-05-2011 2:26 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 9 by Admin, posted 09-05-2011 7:52 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 10 by fearandloathing, posted 09-05-2011 10:41 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 11 (631996)
09-05-2011 5:52 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by NoNukes
09-05-2011 2:13 AM


Biological Evolution
NoNukes writes:
In fact there is no evolution section.
In Fact there is a "Biological Evolution" forum.
There can be a Creationism forum. What's so hard to understand?
It doesn't need it's own huge section. Just a forum like the one stated above where references can be used as evidence that one would get from a Creationist site for example and not get suspended for it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by NoNukes, posted 09-05-2011 2:13 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by NoNukes, posted 09-05-2011 2:23 PM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 11 (631998)
09-05-2011 6:04 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by PaulK
09-05-2011 2:26 AM


The debate
PaulK writes:
So what discussions would be placed in a special creationism section and why ?
Well, for one Creationists would be better able to make there points with the evidence that is available to them. The evidence that is supplied by Creation scientists for instance.
There are Creationists that do research and when it's stated in a Science forum like the great flood for example it's shot down gibberish. It isn't doing anything for the discussion.
It would be a better way for Creationists to express themselves here instead of fearing they might get suspended for supplying evidence that evolutionists don't agree with.
What's so hard to understand? Creationists have their hands tied here. It's no fun. It should be exciting to debate with people instead of fearing you are potentialy "lying" or trying to decieve everyone intentionally when you're only trying to convey the evidence you have from certain sources.
Isn't the evidence available to all? Is it so bad to present the only evidence we have? What else can creationists do? I guess we could stop debating in the Science forums, which seems to have already happened.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by PaulK, posted 09-05-2011 2:26 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Huntard, posted 09-05-2011 6:34 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 8 by PaulK, posted 09-05-2011 7:23 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 11 (632004)
09-05-2011 6:54 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Huntard
09-05-2011 6:34 AM


Re: The debate
Listen, Im just asking if there can be a forum/section where we can discuss Creationism freely, that's all.
Percy brings up some good points in this comment on the Do creationists actually understand their own arguments?in the coffee house:
Message 26

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Huntard, posted 09-05-2011 6:34 AM Huntard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024