Why prefer the Biblical creation account over those of other religions?

Where is the historical evidence?

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Oh really by what and by who? Where doe the above passage mention anything that could be inferred that anythig about evolution is true or false? There is nothing inthe passage that has anything to do with evolution.Edited by bluescat48, : missing ""Edited by bluescat48, : missing "

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

How is pointing out that your passage doesn't reflect what you said it does. What do you think? Do you think we Atheists don't own and read the Bible? If you post somethig, be prepared for someone to comment on it.Edited by bluescat48, : mye typonh

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

Which shows that it may be truth to you, but it does not make it true to all. Your faith is not shared by all. You, like me, may have been indoctrinated into Christianity as a young child, but some of us chose to investigate the stories and draw conclusions from the stories and any evidence for or against, not from some person telling me what the story says.

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

What is your source that shows that your Biblical account is the truth?
Why is your mythology better than say the Egyption, Roman, Norse or Greek?

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

You obviously know nothing about either natural selection or punctuated equilibrium. In neither would pear trees produce apple trees, that is just as ridiculous as the crocoduck.

No just that the creo's don't understand evolution. Genus A doesn't change to genus B, even in the same family. Even Punctuated equilibrium takes a number of generations, just less that natural selection.

As if the Bible didn't steal from other sources. The spoken word creation stories Ie: genesis came later that the first of the Spoken word creation story, that of the Sumerians.
One only has to look at where Sumeria was, the lower part of Mesopotamia, the area later taken by the Babylonians, who had the land at the time Abraham left Ur and eventually wound up in Canaan. Logically he would have taken the account with him. As with any story, it changes over time do to human input. The stories may not totally jive, but the the base is the same. This can also be seen in the differences in Genesis 1 (Priestly) and Genesis 2 (Jahwist). Edited by bluescat48, : my typpppinngg

The Hebrew nation does not exist, never did. What was , was the nation, of Israel and that splintered into Israel & Judah. and only lasted for a short time before Israel was over run by the Assyrians & Judah was over run by the Chaldeans. Whether the manuscripts are reliable or not is moot. There is no evidence to back it up.

Really? Lets see that evidence, so it can be peer reviewed.