Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,468 Year: 3,725/9,624 Month: 596/974 Week: 209/276 Day: 49/34 Hour: 0/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quick Questions, Short Answers - No Debate
Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4444 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


Message 94 of 341 (632543)
09-08-2011 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Panda
09-08-2011 12:48 PM


Re: Flat Earth
Hello Panda and RAZD,
I think without testing the shape of the earth: the level of conspiracy required to make people believe a flat earth is spherical is beyond credibility.
It may be beyond your credibility but we should start teaching it in science classes just in case.
Your round earth theory is not the only option you know

I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong
Butterfly, AKA, mallethead - Dawn Bertot
"Superstitions and nonsense from the past should not prevent us from making progress. If we hold ourselves back, we admit that our fears are more powerful than our abilities." Hunters of Dune Herbert & Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Panda, posted 09-08-2011 12:48 PM Panda has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by RAZD, posted 09-08-2011 2:19 PM Butterflytyrant has not replied

Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4444 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


Message 161 of 341 (648421)
01-15-2012 4:59 PM


the flood
In your opinion, what would be the top 3 to 5 arguments to put on the table to support the position that the flood of Noah is impossible?
There seem to be lots and lots of arguments, I am really just interested in researching a few in depth.
I am particularly interested in the ones that discuss the earth heating to the point that it would kill everything.
Cheers,
BT

Replies to this message:
 Message 162 by crashfrog, posted 01-15-2012 5:01 PM Butterflytyrant has replied
 Message 163 by jar, posted 01-15-2012 5:03 PM Butterflytyrant has not replied
 Message 164 by Coyote, posted 01-15-2012 5:09 PM Butterflytyrant has not replied
 Message 165 by RAZD, posted 01-15-2012 7:49 PM Butterflytyrant has not replied
 Message 172 by Rrhain, posted 01-16-2012 4:25 AM Butterflytyrant has not replied

Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4444 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


Message 167 of 341 (648463)
01-15-2012 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 162 by crashfrog
01-15-2012 5:01 PM


Re: the flood
would you have an example? Dont the fundies believe that the flood occured 4500 BCE?
ABE - retract that. The flood was supposed to be around 2250 BCE.
I had my bullshit creationist claims mixed up.
Edited by Butterflytyrant, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by crashfrog, posted 01-15-2012 5:01 PM crashfrog has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024