Why prefer the Biblical creation account over those of other religions?

The Biblical record has a great deal of corroborating evidence for it's credibility.

Jar, I've cited the evidence many times for these in the threads. You're secularistic bias forbids you to acknowledge it. To repeat it to you is a total waste of time and band-width.

I know full well what evidence is. I go by the Online Dictionary. Admin goes by his own unique EvC version so as not to allow me in science or Biblical Accuracy forums. His version categorically eliminates any evidence relative to the supernatural. Simple as that.The evidence I cited for this thread is real evidence that the Biblical record is THE record. All others have none whatsoever.

LOL, Panda. No wonder. His EvC unique and exclusive definition aids and abets the majority view's ideology while censoring and silencing that of their creationist counterparts. When you or some secularist researcher falsify scientist Moller's research, get back to us. You need also to falsify all of the corroborating evidence which was cited before your charge is justified.

My point went right over your head, PD, being that the more corroborated evidence for the record at large, the more credibility to parts and parcels of the whole. Your strawman analogy does not qualify as anything significant. It is more of looking in retrospect than prophecy. Biblical prophecies, supportive to the Biblical record AT LARGE are far more significant, involving specific phenomenal fulfillments centuries out in the future, involving many nations. Case in point would be the phenomenal restoration of the scattered Jews back to restore their ancient nation.

LOL. all of the Jewish OT scriptures were before the Christian era. What, having any significant corroborative evidences of the supernatural deity depicted in them precedes Abraham?

Hi Wolly. Welcome. To delve into evidence perse would involve a lot of topics. It would lead to debates on some or all. I suggest you click on my username which will take you to my profile. It goes back 8+ years. There are threads with lists etc. about the various corroborative evidences supportive to the reliability of the Biblical record. Likely you'll not find any of these to be the case with pagan and Johnny-come-lately religions.

Hey Wolly, (I hope you don't mind the nickname) I appreciate the effort you've gone to for a response. I'll post a few comments about your message. There are a number of corroborative evidences which you missed which is to be expected since you're a new member.

fundamentalist nations, that is nations which are the closest to the Biblical principles, be it Israel in the Old Testament (OT) or Christianity in the Christian era.
​
The Catholic nations such as during the Inquisitions etc as well as Modern ones like Mexico, Central & South American nations, and some European nations, etc who have deviated from Biblical New Testament principles set forth by Jesus and his apostles by and large have been less prosperous, free and blessed as
​
Protestant nations which have adhered closer to them. The US, being the most Biblically fundamental, by and large is the best example.
​
Israel was blessed when it followed God's laws for them and suffered when they deviated into pagan practices. That alone should tell us something relative to this thread.
​
The pagan nations and cultures of Africa and South America, the Islands etc have been the most uncivilized, blessed, prosperous.
​
Fundamentalist Protestant Christian nations have lent the most help to distressed nations who have suffered disasters, famine, etc, furnishing funds, personnel, clothes, food, airlifts, etc to the less Biblical nations. They get little or no help from any of the other religions such as Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist, Roman Catholic, etc.
​
2. Prophecy. You missed a number of significant ones, such as by Jesus and some of the apostles, particularly the prophet John in Revelation. Some examples are global marks & numbers monetary system (emerging), climate change, increase of homosexuality, children disobedient to parents, apostasy from Christianity, severe persecution of Christians, signs in the heavens, technology increase such as TV (ability for all nations to view local events, global new world order (emerging) etc etc.
​
The OT is rife with prophecies relative to Israel, Jesus's claim as messiah, end time events such as nations assembling in the Mid East, Israel's phenomenal restoration, climate change, The Abrahamic Covenant, nations being blessed who bless Israel and cursed who curse Israel, etc, naming nations which will be hostile to invade restored Israel, etc.
​
3. Historical. Fulfilled prophecy, rise and fall of empires, etc. There is more verifiable history in the Bible than in any other religious book.
​
Josephus's writings come to mind.
​
4. Government: Muslim, Roman Catholic, Hindu, Buddhist, Pagan etc cultures, by and large, have experienced more oppressive treatment from their governments than have Protestant Christian cultures.
​
5. War: Prisoners of war treated worse than nations listed about, by and large.
​
6. Archeological. What do you think about the Exodus debate threads. Have you viewed the videos, etc?
​
Many cities, cultures, people and places etc, once questionable as having existed, eventually discovered by archaeologists. The Dead Sea Scrolls being significant, etc.

As for Islam, I'm surprised you even mention Islam in comparison with the Bible relative to evidence.Mohammed gleaned much of his doctrine from a very distorted and limited knowledge of the OT. The only significant prophecy in it that I can think of is that it will eventually become the mainline world religion. Guess what? The Biblical prophecies beat him to it, naming prominent Muslim nations who will ally with nations north of Israel (Russia, Turkey, etc) to have enough global clout to do a Desert Storm like invasion of Israel in the end time; Armageddon.Islam has precious little of any of the things listed above relative to the Biblical record.I hope this helps.

Say what? Torah preceded by NT Christianity, Levitical law and all, when, in fact Jesus and the apostles advocated none of it for the Christian dispensation?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok. You got the cart before the horse.Nothing was stolen from anybody, Dr Adequate. When you delve into serious Biblical study, you soon learn that the NT baptism of God's Holy Spirit into the very bodies of believers who have received Jesus as lord and savior, i.e. the born againers, i.e. the true christian church at large, you come to understand that the OT Levitical Law was eliminated and the dispensation of grace via Jesus, becoming he sacrificial lamb, the mediator/priest and the bodies of Holy Spirit indwelt replacing the temple. The law of grace replaced the rigid OT law of punishment etc. It requires some serious study and understanding, just as stuff related to physics etc requires in order to master it.Thankfully, I've studiously been into the mastering it since my childhood, being then convinced of the evidence via prophecy, etc of the existence of Jehovah and the credibility of the Biblical record.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------