You are not alone in that as the idea that a Planck particle, i.e. something very small could have existed on its own and in an absolute isolation while embedded in pure nothing at the time zero is embraced by millions of professionals as the height of current scientific wisdom.
That's certainly not the case, as this bears no relationship to any mainstream scientific thought.
Which view is stupid nonsense here and which is not is the question.
You don't even
have a view, Maddenstein. You have a word salad, and somehow you've convinced yourself that you can produce scientific thought by aping scientific language. It's most likely the case that
actual scientific positions are so beyond your capabilities that they seem like nonsense to you, and your hope is that if you produce nonsense that sounds something like it, you've somehow accidentally produced knowledge. You're like a kind of accidental Sokal affair, or another one in the vein of the Bogandov brothers. Only, the difference between you and those other instances of scientific pomposity is that
they were actually able to fool people. You've fooled only Bolder-Dash, apparently, which is approximately as difficult as convincing a two-year-old that you've stolen his nose.
™ Version 4.2